Skip to content

A Meadian Approach to Radical Bohmian Dialogue

Chris Francovich

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour June 13, 2016 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12114 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 5
Key points Argues that a practice of open, receptive, non-judgmental dialogue can enable mutual transformation of perspectives, and proposes two rationales for it: regular "social maintenance" of embodied consciousness to keep the past and future from colonizing the living present, and teaching a skill for respectful engagement with others. Contends that suspending judgment, assumption, and habit allows interlocutors to hold their history in "tensional abeyance" and attend to the living present beyond reified identities.

Abstract

Abstracts Issues of communication and the possibilities for the transformation of perspectives through an experimental dialogue resulting in a mutual, open, receptive, and non‐judgmental consideration of the other are addressed in this paper from transdisciplinary theoretical and conceptual standpoints. The warrant for cultivating this type of communicative ability is based on arguments resulting from the assumption of widespread confusion and conflict in intrapersonal, interpersonal, intergroup, and ecological relations across the globe. I argue that there are two distinct classes of “reasons” for this proposed practice of dialogue. First is recognition of the need for human individuals to engage in a regular and systematic “social maintenance” of embodied consciousness to forestall the continuous colonization of the past/future on the living present that embodied consciousness entails. Second is the teaching of a skill to creatively and respectfully engage with others in a mutual transformation of perspectives. This paper addresses the general problem of perspectives and reflexivity at the root of the communication phenomenon and by extension – to its scale and to its pathologies in individuals and collectives. It is argued that suspension of judgment, assumption, and habit (broadly) helps interlocutors to recognize the possibility of holding one's history in a tensional abeyance and to focus on the living present independent of habitualized and reified identities and the embodied manner in which we unconsciously carry ourselves as social or “universalized selves” in social situations.

Citations in the library