Pharmacological and Toxicological Effects of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Their Metabolites
S. Tai, William E Fantegrossi
Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 2017 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_60 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key findings | The authors argue that synthetic cannabinoids pose greater health risks than marijuana because they act as full CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists, while Δ9-THC is typically a partial agonist, and because several SCB metabolites retain high receptor affinity and intrinsic activity. They also contend that SCBs may cause adverse drug–drug interactions, concluding SCBs should not be considered safe or legal alternatives to marijuana. |
Abstract
Commercial preparations containing synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) are rapidly emerging as drugs of abuse. Although often assumed to be “safe” and “legal” alternatives to cannabis, reports indicate that SCBs induce toxicity not often associated with the primary psychoactive component of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). This chapter will summarize the evidence that use of SCBs poses greater health risks relative to marijuana and suggest that distinct pharmacological properties and metabolism of SCBs relative to Δ9-THC may contribute to this increased toxicity. Studies reviewed will indicate that in contrast to partial agonist properties of Δ9-THC typically observed in vitro, SCBs act as full CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists both in cellular assays and animal studies. Furthermore, unlike Δ9-THC metabolism, several SCB metabolites retain high affinity for and exhibit a range of intrinsic activities at CB1 and CB2 receptors. Finally, the potential for SCBs to cause adverse drug–drug interactions with other drugs of abuse, as well as with common therapeutic agents, will be discussed. Collectively, the evidence provided in this chapter indicates that SCBs should not be considered safe and legal alternatives to marijuana. Instead, the enhanced toxicity of SCBs relative to marijuana, perhaps resulting from the combined actions of a complex mixture of different SCBs present and their active metabolites that retain high affinity for CB1 and CB2 receptors, highlights the inherent danger that may accompany use of these substances.
Citations in the library
Cited by 7
- Molecular insights into GPCR mechanisms for drugs of abuse. Journal of Biological Chemistry September 1, 2023
- Decoding the Toxicity of Synthetic Cannabinoids: From Receptor Activation to Multiorgan Dysfunction. Medicinal Research Reviews June 24, 2026
- Metabolites of Synthetic Cannabinoid 5F-MDMB-PINACA Retain Affinity, Act as High Efficacy Agonists and Exhibit Atypical Pharmacodynamic Properties at CB1 Receptors. Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology April 26, 2022
- 'Synthetic cannabis': A dangerous misnomer. International Journal of Drug Policy December 1, 2021
- The synthetic cannabinoids phenomenon: from structure to toxicological properties. A review Critical Reviews in Toxicology May 27, 2020
and 2 more in the library
Cites 8
- Beyond THC: The New Generation of Cannabinoid Designer Drugs Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2011
- Disruption of hippocampal synaptic transmission and long‐term potentiation by psychoactive synthetic cannabinoid ‘Spice’ compounds: comparison with Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol Addiction Biology January 5, 2016
- Differential drug-drug interactions of the synthetic Cannabinoids JWH-018 and JWH-073: implications for drug abuse liability and pain therapy. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics September 2013
- Reversible and regionally selective downregulation of brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors in chronic daily cannabis smokers Molecular Psychiatry July 12, 2011
- Phase I hydroxylated metabolites of the K2 synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 retain in vitro and in vivo cannabinoid 1 receptor affinity and activity. PLoS One 2011
and 3 more in the library