The impact of Cannabis in Schizophrenia: Pafip Three-year Longitudinal Study on Outcome and Functionality After a First Episode of Psychosis
M. Gomez Revuelta, María Juncal Ruiz, O. Porta Olivares, Mabel Rodríguez, D. Abejas Díez, L. Sánchez Blanco, R. Landera Rodríguez, Rosa Blanco, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro, I. Madrazo del Río Hortega, R. Gutierrez Martin
European Psychiatry April 1, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1962 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 163 |
| Population | Patients recruited after a first episode of psychosis in an early intervention program (PAFIP) |
| Duration | Three years, with follow-up at six-month intervals |
| Measures | BPRS, SAPS, SANS, CDRS, GAF, Drake |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Key findings | No statistically significant differences in functionality were observed at three-year follow-up, but the group that stopped cannabis use showed a trend toward better-preserved functioning and had lower scores on positive symptom scales than the other groups. The authors conclude that interrupting cannabis use may benefit short-term clinical prognosis and long-term functionality. |
Abstract
Introduction: The association between cannabis and psychosis makes crucial the intervention on cannabis use disorder at first episodes of psychosis (FEP), especially among young population. In this group of patients, the harmful potential of cannabis is more evident by its influence on neurodevelopment. However, the nature of the association cannabis-psychosis is not clearly described. It seems to represent a mediating factor for an increased risk of psychosis in healthy and high-risk populations, determining an earlier age of onset and worsening long term outcome.
Objectives: To assess the impact of cannabis in terms of functional and clinical prognosis in patients recruited after a FEP. Material and methods PAFIP is an early intervention program for early stages of psychosis. One hundred and sixty-three were included, followed-up at regular intervals of six months for three years with administration of clinical and functional scales (BPRS, SAPS, SANS, CDRS, GAF and Drake). Patients were divided into three groups: (1) those non-users neither before the onset nor during follow-up (nn) PEP, (2) consumers before the FEP and during follow-up (ss) and (3) consumers before the FEP that gave up consumption during follow-up (sn).
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of functionality at three-year follow-up endpoint but a trend to a better-preserved functionality in the sn group. The sn group presented lower scores in scales for positive symptoms with respect to the comparison groups.
Conclusions: The interruption in cannabis use may have a beneficial effect on short-term clinical prognosis and functionality on long term. Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Comparable studies
Other observational and cohort studies on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis People with first episode of psychosis and healthy controls from the local population | 2009 | Case-control study | n = 454 |
| Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population | 2013 | Observational study | |
| Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people | 2000 | Observational | |
| Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study Individuals from the general population in Germany aged 14-24 at baseline | 2011 | Observational cohort | n = 1,923 |
| Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases Patients treated for cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms in Denmark between 1994 and... | 2005 | Observational cohort | n = 535 |