Skip to content

Previous cannabis exposure modulates the acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on attentional salience and fear processing.

Marco Colizzi, Philip Mcguire, Vincent Giampietro, Steve C. R. Williams, Mick Brammer, Sagnik Bhattacharyya

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology December 2018 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000221 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures, within-subject Δ9-THC challenge study using fMRI Peer reviewed
Sample size 24
Population Healthy men: 12 nonusers (<5 lifetime cannabis joints smoked) and 12 abstinent-modest cannabis users (24.5 ± 9 lifetime cannabis joints smoked)
Intervention Δ9-THC
Topics Cannabis
Key points Δ9-THC disrupted attentional salience and emotional-processing brain activity and induced transient anxiety and psychotic symptoms, but these acute symptomatic, behavioral, and neurophysiological effects were more pronounced in nonusers than in abstinent-modest cannabis users. Cannabis users showed residual effects of prior exposure yet more blunted responses to the acute challenge in an exposure-dependent manner.

Abstract

Cannabis can induce transient psychotic and anxiety symptoms and long-lasting disorders. The acute psychoactive effects of its main active ingredient, (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), may be modulated by previous cannabis exposure. Secondary data analyses tested whether modest previous cannabis exposure modulated the acute effects of Δ9-THC on attentional salience and emotional processing and their neurophysiological substrates. Twenty-four healthy men participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures, within-subject, Δ9-THC challenge study using fMRI. Compared with nonusers (NUs; n = 12; <5 lifetime cannabis joints smoked), abstinent-modest cannabis users (CUs; n = 12; 24.5 ± 9 lifetime cannabis joints smoked) showed less efficient attentional salience processing and recruited different/additional brain areas to process attentional salient and emotional stimuli (all ps ≤ .01). The Δ9-THC challenge disrupted attentional salience and emotional-processing-related brain activity and induced transient anxiety and psychotic symptoms (all ps ≤ .02). However, Δ9-THC-induced psychotic symptoms and attentional salience behavioral impairment were more pronounced in NUs compared with CUs (all ps ≤ .04). Also, NUs under Δ9-THC shifted toward recruitment of other brain areas to perform the tasks. Conversely, CUs were less affected by the acute challenge in an exposure-dependent manner, showing a neurophysiological pattern similar to that of NUs under placebo. Only in NUs, Δ9-THC-induced psychotic symptom and cognitive impairment severity was associated with a more pronounced neurophysiological alteration (all ps ≤ .048). In conclusion, CUs displayed residual effects of cannabis exposure but more blunted responses to the acute symptomatic, behavioral, and neurophysiological effects of Δ9-THC, which were more marked in NUs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 48
Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... 2009 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial n = 15
Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers Healthy male subjects 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 16
Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... 2009 Randomized controlled trial n = 15
Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Healthy volunteers with a history of light cannabis use 2019 Randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics