Skip to content

Residual effects of ecstasy (3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine) on low level visual processes

Elizabeth Murray, Raimondo Bruno, John Brown

Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental March 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1002/hup.2218 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case-control study Peer reviewed
Sample size 42
Population 19 ecstasy users (6 ecstasy only, 13 ecstasy-plus-cannabis) and 23 matched controls (9 cannabis-only, 14 drug-naive)
Measures tilt aftereffect paradigm
Topics MDMA
Key findings Ecstasy users had a significantly greater tilt aftereffect than non-users for real contours (Hedge's g = 0.63) but not for illusory contours (g = 0.20). The authors argue this pattern supports the view that residual ecstasy effects, and reduced serotonin, impair lateral inhibition between orientation-selective neurons in V1, while suggesting ecstasy may not substantially affect this process in V2.

Abstract

‘Ecstasy’ (3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine) induces impaired functioning in the serotonergic system, including the occipital lobe. This study employed the ‘tilt aftereffect’ paradigm to operationalise the function of orientation‐selective neurons among ecstasy consumers and controls as a means of investigating the role of reduced serotonin on visual orientation processing. The magnitude of the tilt aftereffect reflects the extent of lateral inhibition between orientation‐selective neurons and is elicited to both ‘real’ contours, processed in visual cortex area V1, and illusory contours, processed in V2. The magnitude of tilt aftereffect to both contour types was examined among 19 ecstasy users (6 ecstasy only; 13 ecstasy‐plus‐cannabis users) and 23 matched controls (9 cannabis‐only users; 14 drug‐naive). Ecstasy users had a significantly greater tilt magnitude than non‐users for real contours (Hedge'sg = 0.63) but not for illusory contours (g = 0.20). These findings provide support for literature suggesting that residual effects of ecstasy (and reduced serotonin) impairs lateral inhibition between orientation‐selective neurons in V1, which however suggests that ecstasy may not substantially affect this process in V2. Multiple studies have now demonstrated ecstasy‐related deficits on basic visual functions, including orientation and motion processing. Such low‐level effects may contribute to the impact of ecstasy use on neuropsychological tests of visuospatial function. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Subjective Reports of the Effects of MDMA in a Clinical Setting Individuals who took MDMA in a clinical setting 1986 Observational study
Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA ("Ecstasy") users Abstinent MDMA users 1998 Observational cohort
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers Older, more educated, drug-experienced individuals 1986 Observational cohort
Cognitive performance in recreational users of MDMA or 'ecstasy': evidence for memory deficits Young people who were regular or novice MDMA users, or non-users 1998 Observational cohort n = 30

Citations in the library

Explore topics