Skip to content

Parsing the heterogeneity of depression: An exploratory factor analysis across commonly used depression rating scales.

Elizabeth D. Ballard, Julia S Yarrington, Cristan A Farmer, Marc S. Lener, Bashkim Kadriu, Níall Lally, Deonte Williams, Rodrigo Machado‐Vieira, Mark J. Niciu, Lawrence T. Park, Carlos A. Zarate

Journal of Affective Disorders April 15, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.027 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Secondary analysis of clinical trial data using exploratory factor analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 119
Population Inpatients with major depressive disorder (n=76) or bipolar depression (n=43) participating in clinical ketamine trials; trajectory analysis included 41 subjects with bipolar depression
Intervention Ketamine
Measures Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Rating Scale (SHAPS)
Topics Depression Ketamine
Keywords Clinical trials Factor analysis Psychometrics
Key findings Eight unidimensional symptom constructs were identified across four depression rating scales, and their trajectories in ketamine trial data showed varied treatment and placebo response patterns that the authors suggest may not be captured by traditional scoring of individual instruments.

Abstract

Due to the heterogeneity of depressive symptoms-which can include depressed mood, anhedonia, negative cognitive biases, and altered activity levels-researchers often use a combination of depression rating scales to assess symptoms. This study sought to identify unidimensional constructs measured across rating scales for depression and to evaluate these constructs across clinical trials of a rapid-acting antidepressant (ketamine). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on baseline ratings from the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Rating Scale (SHAPS). Inpatients with major depressive disorder (n = 76) or bipolar depression (n = 43) were participating in clinical ketamine trials. The trajectories of the resulting unidimensional scores were evaluated in 41 subjects with bipolar depression who participated in clinical ketamine trials. The best solution, which exhibited excellent fit to the data, comprised eight factors: Depressed Mood, Tension, Negative Cognition, Impaired Sleep, Suicidal Thoughts, Reduced Appetite, Anhedonia, and Amotivation. Various response patterns were observed across the clinical trial data, both in treatment effect (ketamine versus placebo) and in degree of placebo response, suggesting that use of these unidimensional constructs may reveal patterns not observed with traditional scoring of individual instruments. Limitations include: 1) small sample (and related inability to confirm measurement invariance); 2) absence of an independent sample for confirmation of factor structure; and 3) the treatment-resistant nature of the population, which may limit generalizability. The empirical identification of unidimensional constructs creates more refined scores that may elucidate the connection between specific symptoms and underlying pathophysiology.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Rapid Resolution of Suicidal Ideation After a Single Infusion of anN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonist in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Subjects with DSM-IV-diagnosed treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2010 Open-label trial n = 33
Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults (≥ 18 years) with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term study n = 802
Intravenous arketamine for treatment-resistant depression: open-label pilot study Humans with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Open-label pilot trial n = 7
A Phase 2 Open Label Study of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SLS-002 (Intranasal Racemic Ketamine) in Adults with MDD at Imminent Risk of Suicide. Hospitalized patients with Major Depressive Disorder and acute suicidal ideation and... 2024 Open label study n = 17
Ketamine Safety and Tolerability in Clinical Trials for Treatment-Resistant Depression Participants with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant... 2014 Pooled analysis of three clinical trials n = 97

Citations in the library

Cited by 17

and 12 more in the library

Cites 7

and 2 more in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice