Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Inhaled Esketamine in Healthy Volunteers

Kelly Jonkman, Andreas Duma, Erik Olofsen, Thomas K. Henthorn, Monique van Velzen, René A. G. Mooren, Liesbeth Siebers, Jojanneke van den Beukel, Leon Aarts, Marieke Niesters, Albert Dahan

Anesthesiology July 30, 2017 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000001798 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pharmacokinetic modeling study Peer reviewed
Sample size 19
Population Healthy volunteers
Intervention Esketamine
Dose dose escalation from 25 to 100 mg inhaled; single intravenous dose 20 mg
Topics Esketamine
Citations 56
Key points Inhaled nebulized esketamine has substantially reduced bioavailability, with a dose-independent loss of about 70% and a dose-dependent loss that impairs absorption by 50% at a plasma concentration of 406 ng/ml. Over the concentration range tested, up to 50% of inhaled esketamine is lost. The authors propose the dose-independent loss is due to drug retention and particle exhalation, and the dose-dependent loss is probably due to sedation-related loss of drug into the air.

Abstract

Background: Esketamine is traditionally administered via intravenous or intramuscular routes. In this study we developed a pharmacokinetic model of inhalation of nebulized esketamine with special emphasis on pulmonary absorption and bioavailability.

Methods: Three increasing doses of inhaled esketamine (dose escalation from 25 to 100 mg) were applied followed by a single intravenous dose (20 mg) in 19 healthy volunteers using a nebulizer system and arterial concentrations of esketamine and esnorketamine were obtained. A multicompartmental pharmacokinetic model was developed using population nonlinear mixed-effects analyses.

Results: The pharmacokinetic model consisted of three esketamine, two esnorketamine disposition and three metabolism compartments. The inhalation data were best described by adding two absorption pathways, an immediate and a slower pathway, with rate constant 0.05 ± 0.01 min (median ± SE of the estimate). The amount of esketamine inhaled was reduced due to dose-independent and dose-dependent reduced bioavailability. The former was 70% ± 5%, and the latter was described by a sigmoid EMAX model characterized by the plasma concentration at which absorption was impaired by 50% (406 ± 46 ng/ml). Over the concentration range tested, up to 50% of inhaled esketamine is lost due to the reduced dose-independent and dose-dependent bioavailability.

Conclusions: We successfully modeled the inhalation of nebulized esketamine in healthy volunteers. Nebulized esketamine is inhaled with a substantial reduction in bioavailability. Although the reduction in dose-independent bioavailability is best explained by retention of drug and particle exhalation, the reduction in dose-dependent bioavailability is probably due to sedation-related loss of drug into the air.

Citations in the library

Explore topics