Impure but not inactive: Behavioral pharmacology of dibenzylpiperazine, a common by-product of benzylpiperazine synthesis
Sean B. Dolan, Ritu A. Shetty, Michael J. Forster, Michael B. Gatch
Journal of Psychopharmacology June 18, 2018 DOI: 10.1177/0269881118780613 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Preclinical behavioral pharmacology study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Mice and rats |
| Interventions | Dibenzylpiperazine (DBZP) meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) tri-fluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) |
| Measures | locomotor activity assay, conditioned place preference assay, drug discrimination assay |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key points | DBZP fully substituted for methamphetamine in drug discrimination tests, produced subthreshold responding for cocaine and MDMA, and failed to substitute for DOM, while TFMPP and mCPP produced only subthreshold responding for methamphetamine and MDMA, respectively. None of the compounds produced a place preference, and DBZP caused convulsions in rats at the highest dose. The authors conclude DBZP is behaviorally active with some abuse liability and potential for adverse health effects, resembling BZP more than serotonergic piperazines but with lower potency and efficacy. |
Abstract
Background: Substituted piperazines comprise a substantial proportion of the novel psychoactive substance market. Among the most widely abused piperazine compounds are meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), tri-fluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP), and, especially, benzylpiperazine (BZP), which are commonly incorporated, either alone or in combination, in illicit "party pills" or "ecstasy" formulations. Illicit synthesis of BZP often results in production of an impure by-product dibenzylpiperazine (DBZP), which frequently appears alongside BZP in these formulations; however, despite its ubiquity, little information exists regarding the abuse liability of DBZP.
Aims: The current study aimed to evaluate the abuse-related behavioral pharmacology of DBZP.
Methods: DBZP, mCPP, and TFMPP were tested in parallel in mice in locomotor activity and conditioned place preference assays, and in a drug discrimination assay with rats trained to discriminate either methamphetamine, cocaine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), or -2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine(DOM).
Results: Each of the compounds tested produced dose-dependent decreases in locomotor activity. DBZP substituted fully for methamphetamine, produced subthreshold drug-appropriate responding for cocaine and MDMA, and failed to substitute for DOM. Conversely, TFMPP and mCPP only produced subthreshold drug-appropriate responding for methamphetamine and MDMA, respectively, and both compounds failed to substitute for cocaine or DOM. None of the compounds tested produced a place preference. DBZP produced convulsions in rats at the highest dose tested.
Conclusions: These data indicate that DBZP is more similar to BZP, albeit with lower potency and efficacy, than its serotonergic piperazine counterparts, and is a behaviorally-active compound with some abuse liability and potential for adverse health effects.
Citations in the library
Cites 10
- Effects of “Legal X” Piperazine Analogs on Dopamine and Serotonin Release in Rat Brain Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences October 1, 2004
- Subjective effects in humans following administration of party pill drugs BZP and TFMPP alone and in combination Drug Testing and Analysis April 28, 2011
- Discriminative stimulus and locomotor effects of para-substituted and benzofuran analogs of amphetamine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence November 1, 2017
- Locomotor, discriminative stimulus, and place conditioning effects of MDAI in rodents. Behavioural Pharmacology September 2016
- Determining the subjective and physiological effects of BZP combined with TFMPP in human males. Psychopharmacology April 2011
and 5 more in the library