Skip to content

Impure but not inactive: Behavioral pharmacology of dibenzylpiperazine, a common by-product of benzylpiperazine synthesis

Sean B. Dolan, Ritu A. Shetty, Michael J. Forster, Michael B. Gatch

Journal of Psychopharmacology June 18, 2018 DOI: 10.1177/0269881118780613 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Preclinical behavioral pharmacology study Peer reviewed
Population Mice and rats
Interventions Dibenzylpiperazine (DBZP) meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) tri-fluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP)
Measures locomotor activity assay, conditioned place preference assay, drug discrimination assay
Citations 2
Key points DBZP fully substituted for methamphetamine in drug discrimination tests, produced subthreshold responding for cocaine and MDMA, and failed to substitute for DOM, while TFMPP and mCPP produced only subthreshold responding for methamphetamine and MDMA, respectively. None of the compounds produced a place preference, and DBZP caused convulsions in rats at the highest dose. The authors conclude DBZP is behaviorally active with some abuse liability and potential for adverse health effects, resembling BZP more than serotonergic piperazines but with lower potency and efficacy.

Abstract

Background: Substituted piperazines comprise a substantial proportion of the novel psychoactive substance market. Among the most widely abused piperazine compounds are meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), tri-fluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP), and, especially, benzylpiperazine (BZP), which are commonly incorporated, either alone or in combination, in illicit "party pills" or "ecstasy" formulations. Illicit synthesis of BZP often results in production of an impure by-product dibenzylpiperazine (DBZP), which frequently appears alongside BZP in these formulations; however, despite its ubiquity, little information exists regarding the abuse liability of DBZP.

Aims: The current study aimed to evaluate the abuse-related behavioral pharmacology of DBZP.

Methods: DBZP, mCPP, and TFMPP were tested in parallel in mice in locomotor activity and conditioned place preference assays, and in a drug discrimination assay with rats trained to discriminate either methamphetamine, cocaine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), or -2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine(DOM).

Results: Each of the compounds tested produced dose-dependent decreases in locomotor activity. DBZP substituted fully for methamphetamine, produced subthreshold drug-appropriate responding for cocaine and MDMA, and failed to substitute for DOM. Conversely, TFMPP and mCPP only produced subthreshold drug-appropriate responding for methamphetamine and MDMA, respectively, and both compounds failed to substitute for cocaine or DOM. None of the compounds tested produced a place preference. DBZP produced convulsions in rats at the highest dose tested.

Conclusions: These data indicate that DBZP is more similar to BZP, albeit with lower potency and efficacy, than its serotonergic piperazine counterparts, and is a behaviorally-active compound with some abuse liability and potential for adverse health effects.

Citations in the library

Explore topics