Skip to content

Crystals and tablets in the Spanish ecstasy market 2000-2014: Are they the same or different in terms of purity and adulteration?

Claudio Vidal Giné, Mireia Ventura Vilamala, Iván Fornís Espinosa, Cristina Gil Lladanosa, Nú Calzada Álvarez, Ariadna Fitó Fruitós, Joan Rodríguez Rodríguez, Antonia Domíngo Salvany, Rafael De La Torre-Fornell

Forensic Science International June 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.016 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study of voluntarily submitted drug samples Peer reviewed
Sample size 6,200
Population Ecstasy samples voluntarily provided by drug users in Spain, 2000-2014
Duration January 2000 to December 2014
Measures thin layer chromatography, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, ultraviolet spectrophotometry
Topics MDMA
Keywords Adulteration Illegal markets Purity
Key findings Crystal ecstasy was the most common format (60.6%) and more often contained only MDMA than tablets, but adulterated crystals contained more combinations of adulterants, including phenacetin, lidocaine, dextromethorphan, and methamphetamine, which were found almost exclusively in crystals. MDMA content in crystals remained stable, whereas tablet MDMA doses increased sharply after 2010.

Abstract

Although 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has a long history in recreational settings, research on its composition (purity and adulteration) has focused only on tablets even though crystal format is readily available for users. Drug specimens collected between January 2000 and December 2014 were analyzed at Energy Control's facilities. All samples were voluntarily provided by drug users. Sample identification was made with thin layer chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, and quantification with ultraviolet spectrophotometry (only in unadulterated samples). Between January 2000 and December 2014, 6200 samples purchased as ecstasy by their users were analyzed. Crystals were the most frequent format (60.6%) followed by tablets (38.8%). During the study period, the proportion of samples containing only MDMA was higher in crystals than in tablets. Compared with tablets, adulterated crystal samples contained the same number of adulterants but more combinations of different substances. Although caffeine was commonly detected as adulterant both in crystals and tablets, other substances such as phenacetin, lidocaine, dextrometorphan or methamphetamine were detected almost exclusively in crystal samples. The amount of MDMA in crystal samples remained stable unlike tablets for which a huge increase in MDMA dose was observed since 2010. Crystal samples of ecstasy showed clear differences compared to ecstasy tablets and this must be taken into account both in research and harm reduction.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Subjective Reports of the Effects of MDMA in a Clinical Setting Individuals who took MDMA in a clinical setting 1986 Observational study
Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA ("Ecstasy") users Abstinent MDMA users 1998 Observational cohort
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers Older, more educated, drug-experienced individuals 1986 Observational cohort
Cognitive performance in recreational users of MDMA or 'ecstasy': evidence for memory deficits Young people who were regular or novice MDMA users, or non-users 1998 Observational cohort n = 30

Citations in the library

Explore topics