Skip to content

Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to predict implementation of harm reduction strategies among MDMA/ecstasy users.

Alan K. Davis, Harold Rosenberg

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors June 2016 DOI: 10.1037/adb0000167 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Prospective observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 391
Population International sample of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) users recruited through targeted Facebook advertisements
Duration Two-month follow-up
Topics MDMA
Key findings Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were associated with baseline intention to preload/postload and pill test/pill check. At two-month follow-up, baseline habit strength and past three-month ecstasy consumption frequency were the only significant predictors of preloading/postloading use, while baseline intention was the only significant predictor of pill testing. The authors report partial support for Theory of Planned Behavior variables as correlates of intention and predictors of later use.

Abstract

This prospective study was designed to test whether the variables proposed by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) were associated with baseline intention to implement and subsequent use of 2 MDMA/ecstasy-specific harm reduction interventions: preloading/postloading and pill testing/pill checking. Using targeted Facebook advertisements, an international sample of 391 recreational ecstasy users were recruited to complete questionnaires assessing their ecstasy consumption history, and their attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, habit strength (past strategy use), and intention to use these two strategies. Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were significantly associated with baseline intention to preload/postload and pill test/pill check. Out of the 391 baseline participants, 100 completed the two-month follow-up assessment. Baseline habit strength and frequency of ecstasy consumption during the three months prior to baseline were the only significant predictors of how often participants used the preloading/postloading strategy during the follow-up. Baseline intention to pill test/pill check was the only significant predictor of how often participants used this strategy during the follow-up. These findings provide partial support for TPB variables as both correlates of baseline intention to implement and predictors of subsequent use of these two strategies. Future investigations could assess whether factors related to ecstasy consumption (e.g., subjective level of intoxication, craving, negative consequences following consumption), and environmental factors (e.g., accessibility and availability of harm reduction resources) improve the prediction of how often ecstasy users employ these and other harm reduction strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Subjective Reports of the Effects of MDMA in a Clinical Setting Individuals who took MDMA in a clinical setting 1986 Observational study
Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA ("Ecstasy") users Abstinent MDMA users 1998 Observational cohort
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
The Psychological and Physiological Effects of MDMA on Normal Volunteers Older, more educated, drug-experienced individuals 1986 Observational cohort
Cognitive performance in recreational users of MDMA or 'ecstasy': evidence for memory deficits Young people who were regular or novice MDMA users, or non-users 1998 Observational cohort n = 30

Citations in the library

Explore topics