Skip to content

多层级集群涌现-前额叶统合模型:从躯体内稳态信号到意识体验的完整闭环框架 Multi-level Cluster Emergence - Prefrontal Cortex Integration Model (MCE-PFC): A Complete Closed-Loop Framework From Somatic Homeostatic Signals to Conscious Experience

德猛 杨

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) September 25, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22954674 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Key points Proposes that consciousness emerges through a three-stage progression—somatic homeostatic signal emergence, subconscious neural cluster competition, and prefrontal integration—and argues that homeostatic deviation is the ultimate driver of thoughts and desires. The author claims this single framework explains normal consciousness, psychological internal friction, and empathic calm, and offers five falsifiable propositions for neuroimaging and behavioral testing.

Abstract

作者:郭洋洋Author: Guo YangyangORCID:0009-0006-6669-1790Contact email:gyy-goes@foxmail.comPublication Type: PreprintSubmission Date: September 25, 2026Version: v1.0 Final Bilingual EditionPreprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22954675Open Access License: CC BY 4.0 摘要 Abstract 意识是认知科学与神经科学领域的核心难题。当前主流意识理论分别从脑内模块竞争、躯体信号根源、神经元集群选择、顶层执行控制等单一维度展开研究,普遍存在层级断裂、维度混淆、解释域狭窄的局限——既缺乏从细胞-器官-脑的完整纵向涌现链条,也未能清晰区分神经结构层级与主观体验层面的差异,更无法用单一框架同时解释念头自发涌现、心理内耗、共情融合三类核心心智现象。 Consciousness is a core challenge in the fields of cognitive science and neuroscience. Current mainstream theories of consciousness conduct research from single dimensions such as intracerebral module competition, somatic signal origins, neuronal cluster selection, and top-down executive control. They generally suffer from three limitations: hierarchical fracture, dimensional confusion, and narrow explanatory scope. Specifically, they lack a complete vertical emergence chain from cells to organs and then to the brain; fail to clearly distinguish between neural structural hierarchies and subjective experience levels; and cannot simultaneously explain three core mental phenomena—spontaneous emergence of thoughts, psychological internal friction, and empathic fusion—within a single framework. 本文通过整合全局工作空间理论、躯体标记假说、神经达尔文主义与前额叶执行功能理论,构建了多层级集群涌现-前额叶统合模型(MCE-PFC)。该模型提出:意识产生于“躯体集群内稳态信号涌现→潜意识神经集群竞争筛选→前额叶主意识统合”的三层级递进过程;所有念头与欲望的终极驱动源是躯体系统的内稳态偏差;结构层面前额叶与底层脑区存在永久的功能层级差异,体验层面二者可发生临时的神经同频共振,二者属于不同维度,互不矛盾。 By integrating Global Workspace Theory, Somatic Marker Hypothesis, Neural Darwinism, and Prefrontal Executive Function Theory, this paper constructs the Multi-level Cluster Emergence - Prefrontal Cortex Integration Model (MCE-PFC). The model proposes that consciousness arises from a three-stage progressive process: emergence of homeostatic signals from somatic clusters → competitive screening of subconscious neural clusters → integration of primary consciousness by the prefrontal cortex. The ultimate driving source of all thoughts and desires is the homeostatic deviation of the somatic system. At the structural level, there exists a permanent functional hierarchy between the prefrontal cortex and lower brain regions; at the experiential level, temporary neural synchronized resonance can occur between them. The two belong to different dimensions and are not mutually contradictory. 该模型用单一机制同时解释了正常意识运作、心理内耗、共情平静三类典型状态,弥补了现有理论的层级缺口与维度混淆问题,并提出5项可通过神经影像与行为实验验证的可证伪命题,为意识研究、临床心理干预、心智训练实践及认知因果学体系提供了统一的底层机制框架。 This model explains three typical states—normal conscious functioning, psychological internal friction, and empathic calm—with a single mechanism, addressing the hierarchical gaps and dimensional confusion in existing theories. It also puts forward five falsifiable propositions verifiable through neuroimaging and behavioral experiments, providing a unified underlying mechanistic framework for consciousness research, clinical psychological intervention, mental training practice, and the system of cognitive causality. 关键词:意识涌现;躯体标记;前额叶统合;集群竞争;内耗机制;认知因果学Keywords: consciousness emergence; somatic marker; prefrontal integration; cluster competition; internal friction mechanism; cognitive causality