The Psychological Self-Foundation Model: External Dependence and the Repositioning of Self-Worth
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) September 18, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/wyn3h (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Addiction |
| Key points | Argues that psychological self-sustenance depends not only on what one achieves, receives, or is recognized for, but also on whether one can receive experiences that have already occurred as part of one's own life and place value in that fact. Proposes that external sources of worth such as success, approval, and love be repositioned from necessary conditions for self-establishment to additive forms of fulfillment. |
Abstract
This paper proposes the Self-Foundation Model by reconsidering the structure of self-worth and psychological fulfillment through a basic question: Where does a person place the value of the self? External conditions such as approval from others, intimate relationships, social status, occupational success, achievement, and income are important sources of enrichment in life. However, when self-worth and psychological fulfillment become overly concentrated in such external conditions, failure, rejection, comparison, loss, or diminished evaluation may extend beyond disappointment with a particular event and develop into a global negation of the self. The present paper conceptualizes this as a structure in which the conditions required for psychological self-establishment are located primarily outside the self. By contrast, self-foundation refers to a capacity and structure through which at least some minimal sources of self-worth and psychological fulfillment are also located within one’s own lived experience. More specifically, it is the capacity to receive and savor the experiences occurring to oneself as one’s own life, to derive some degree of psychological fulfillment from them, and to remain psychologically standing even when one is alone. The model distinguishes among world-experience, self-foundation, and foundational fulfillment. World-experience refers to the perceptions, bodily sensations, emotions, thoughts, recognitions, and temporal experiences that occur to a person as a subject. Self-foundation refers to the capacity and structure through which such experiences can be received and savored as one’s own life. Foundational fulfillment refers to the minimal psychological satisfaction that may arise from recognizing that one was able to experience the world as oneself and assigning value to that fact. The central hypothesis of the model is that psychological self-sustenance depends not only on what one achieves, receives, or is recognized for, but also on whether one can receive experiences that have already occurred as part of one’s own life and place some degree of value in that fact. Thus, “I felt something” is reframed as “I was able to feel something,” and “I lived today” as “I was able to live through today.” This operation is intended to bring world-experience, which is ordinarily treated as an assumed background condition, back into conscious recognition as something already realized. The Self-Foundation Model overlaps with existing work on mindfulness, gratitude and appreciation, savoring, self-compassion, unconditional self-acceptance, and contingencies of self-worth. Its distinctive feature, however, is not limited to directing attention toward present experience. It proposes a sequence in which one notices experience, recognizes that one was able to experience it, receives it as one’s own life, assigns value to its occurrence, and connects that process to foundational fulfillment. The model further places this foundational process within a hierarchical structure. Upon world-experience and foundational fulfillment, additional sources of fulfillment can be added through everyday experience, action and autonomy, challenge, and external or social acquisitions. Success, approval, love, and achievement are therefore not rejected, but repositioned from necessary conditions for psychological self-establishment to forms of additive fulfillment that may enrich a life that is already psychologically grounded. This structure also has implications for interpersonal relationships and challenge. If the need to be loved or approved of in order to psychologically establish the self is reduced, other people may become less necessary as sources of self-worth and more available as partners with whom value can be mutually created. Likewise, if failure does not threaten the self as a whole, challenge may be experienced less as a test of personal worth and more as an opportunity to add experience to a life that is already underway. As a practical implementation, the paper introduces a Self-Foundation Journaling Method. Its aim is not journaling itself, but the formation of a cognitive pattern through which one can receive one’s own experience as one’s own life. The method combines explicit written practice with brief internal confirmation in everyday life, with the goal of making self-foundational cognition easier to activate. It also proposes a pre-established reconnection procedure for situations in which failure or rejection expands into global self-negation, allowing attention to return to the foundational layer without requiring the immediate elimination of anger, sadness, anxiety, or other unpleasant emotions. Appendix A situates the Self-Foundation Model within a further, deeper functional layer by relating it to the separately developed Deep Functional-Goal Observation Model. At this deeper level, difficult internal reactions such as anxiety, anger, jealousy, and approval-seeking may be understood not only as experiences that can be received as part of one’s own life, but also, provisionally, as outputs of a living mind–body system engaged in regulation, protection, maintenance, recovery, or relational preservation. The Self-Foundation Model remains conceptually independent, while Appendix A presents a deeper functional account of processes that may precede the self-foundational reception of experience. This paper is a theoretical reflection written by an author outside academia and is limited to the presentation of a perspective and a set of hypotheses. It does not provide empirical validation, but develops the model with attention to conceptual distinctions, internal logical consistency, and points of contact with existing research. Its validity therefore remains open to future criticism, empirical testing, and revision.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on addiction, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychedelics as Medicines: An Emerging New Paradigm General population | 2016 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Restructuring reward processing with Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement: novel therapeutic mechanisms to remediate hedonic dysregulation in addiction, stress, and pain. | 2016 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Ayahuasca’s entwined efficacy: An ethnographic study of ritual healing from ‘addiction’ | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Hypotheses Regarding the Mechanisms of Ayahuasca in the Treatment of Addictions | 2012 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Biosynthesis of an Anti-Addiction Agent from the Iboga Plant. | 2019 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |