Dissociative symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation in mental health patients
Max C. Pensel, Johanna M. H. L. Siems, Alexander Blazejak, Charlotte Steinau, Jana Fink, Marie-Therese Schmitz, Alexandra Philipsen, Henrik Rohner
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation July 27, 2026 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-026-00363-1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Longitudinal observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 93 |
| Population | Psychiatric patients with and without PTSD symptoms at study start, plus a control group |
| Duration | Up to three time periods over the first year of the pandemic (04/2020–05/2021) |
| Measures | Fragebogen zu Dissoziativen Symptomen (FDS), adapted and extended German version of the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES) |
| Key findings | Dissociative symptoms were more severe in patients with PTSD symptoms than in other psychiatric patients, and lowest in controls. Regional positive SARS-CoV-2 test counts had no effect, but the intensity of non-pharmacological interventions significantly increased dissociative symptom severity, especially depersonalization and derealization in the PTSD group. |
Abstract
Abstract:
Background: Dissociative symptoms arise in reaction to significant stress and are common in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Methods: We longitudinally investigated the course of dissociative symptoms in psychiatric patients over the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic situation (04/2020–05/2021). The group was separated into patients with relevant symptoms of PTSD at study start (Group 1: PTSDG) and those without (Group 2: noPTSDG), and we also employed a control group (Group 3: CG). Dissociative symptoms were tracked using the “Fragebogen zu Dissoziativen Symptomen” (FDS), an adapted and extended German version of the “Dissociative Experience Scale” (DES). Datasets of 93 participants were analyzed over up to three time periods. In addition, the regional incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests (7di) and the intensity of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) were included in multilevel linear models.
Results: Patients reported stronger dissociative symptoms in the PTSDG than in the noPTSDG, while the CG showed the lowest symptom intensity. Importantly, regarding the course of symptoms over time, while public counts of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests had no influence, dissociative symptom severity was significantly impacted by the intensity of non-pharmacological interventions, particularly in the PTSDG and regarding depersonalization and derealization.
Conclusion: Patients with relevant symptoms of PTSD at study start suffered from intense dissociative symptoms over the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation, driven by non-pharmacological interventions. In a milder way, other psychiatric patients were also affected. The results underline the responsivity of these patient groups regarding social and political stress.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Biological Correlates of Dissociative Disorders: A Systematic Review on Biomarkers and Trauma Connections. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 2025
- Zoomed out: digital media use and depersonalization experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown. Scientific Reports March 10, 2022
- Emotional Experience and Awareness of Self: Functional MRI Studies of Depersonalization Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 2016
- Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease December 1, 1986