A Multi-Site Evaluation of a Psychedelic Medicine Curriculum for Psychiatry Trainees.
Mary E. Yaden, Kelley C O'Donnell, Daniel E. Roberts, Noam Goldway, Praachi Tiwari, Terence H. W. Ching, Jamila Hokanson, Natalie Gukasyan, Brendan Appold, Giancarlo Glick, Benjamin Kelmendi, Stephen Ross, Christopher Pittenger
Academic Psychiatry September 23, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s40596-026-02444-3 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Pre-post educational intervention study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 40 |
| Population | Psychiatry trainees across four residency programs in the Northeast United States |
| Intervention | Psychedelic medicine curriculum |
| Duration | 6-hour course delivered in 2025-2026 |
| Keywords | Curriculum Graduate medical education Psychedelic medicine Psychiatry residents |
| Key points | A standardized 6-hour psychedelic medicine curriculum was associated with significant improvements in trainees' self-assessed knowledge, quiz scores, and confidence in counseling patients about clinical research, harm reduction, and treatment risks. Interest in psychedelic medicine was high at baseline and did not change significantly, nor did plans to pursue opportunities in the field, which the authors suggest indicates the course did not overinflate enthusiasm. |
Abstract
Interest in psychedelic medicine is increasing, yet psychiatry trainees report limited education in this area. The authors developed a standardized curriculum and evaluated its impact on trainee knowledge and attitudes toward psychedelic medicines. A 6-h psychedelic medicine course was delivered across four psychiatry residency programs in the Northeast United States in 2025-2026. The curriculum included six modules covering foundational concepts and evidence, as well as clinical considerations. Anonymous pre- and post-course surveys assessed knowledge, interest, and confidence in counseling. Statistical comparisons were used to evaluate pre-post changes. Forty trainees participated across institutions; 34 completed a pre-course survey and 22 completed a post-course survey. Most trainees reported minimal prior didactic exposure to psychedelic medicine. Self-assessed knowledge as well as scores on a knowledge quiz improved significantly following the course. Self-rated understanding of both the rationale for psychedelic treatments and limitations of evidence increased. Most substantially, confidence in counseling patients about clinical research, harm reduction, and treatment risks improved across domains. Baseline interest in psychedelic medicine was high at the start of the course and did not change significantly following its completion. A multi-site curriculum in psychedelic medicine was associated with increased knowledge and counseling confidence in trainees. The curriculum did not significantly impact interest or plans to pursue opportunities in psychedelic medicine, suggesting the course did not overinflate enthusiasm for the field. Standardized curricula in residency education may help address gaps in psychiatric training as clinicians increasingly encounter questions about these emerging treatments.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- Psychedelic Knowledge and Opinions in Psychiatrists at Two Professional Conferences: An Exploratory Survey Journal of Psychoactive Drugs August 19, 2021
- Psychiatric Residents' Perspectives on Psychedelics and Psychedelic Assisted Therapy. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs July 2, 2025
- Psychedelic medicine in psychiatry residency training: a survey of psychiatric residency program directors. International Review of Psychiatry September 11, 2024
- The Psychedelic Frontier: A Cross-Specialty Review of Healthcare Providers' Attitudes on Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in the US University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine December 9, 2025
- Examining the influence of team-based learning on medical students’ comprehension and attitudes regarding psychedelic therapies Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience September 2, 2024
and 1 more in the library