Skip to content

Epidemiology of disturbing dreams in a diverse US sample.

Courtney B. Worley, Courtney J Bolstad, Michael R Nadorff

Sleep Medicine April 29, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.04.026 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 20,013
Population Diverse sample of adults in the US
Keywords Humans Prevalence Middle aged Female Surveys and questionnaires Epidemiology Nightmares Diverse sample Disturbing dreams
Key findings Disturbing dream prevalence in a diverse US adult sample varied by assessment question: 2.01% for dreams of trauma, 7.21% for dreams of the worst event, and 1.73% for dreams of separation. Rates differed by racial and ethnic group, gender, and age, with women reporting significantly higher rates across all variables (p < 0.01) and older adults reporting significantly lower rates than younger and middle-aged adults (p < 0.001).

Abstract

Study

Objectives: Disturbing dreams are a common complaint among trauma survivors, but little epidemiological research exists to document the frequency in the general population. In addition, information about their occurrence in diverse adults is lacking.

Methods: Using the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys we had the unique opportunity to examine disturbing dreams in a diverse sample of adults in the US. Disturbing dreams were measured in three different variables including trauma dreams, dreams of the worst event, and dreams of separation. A fourth variable was created to assess for any disturbing dream reported across the three categories.

Results: Disturbing dream prevalence varied in the overall sample (N = 20,013) based on the assessment question. Dreams of trauma was 2.01% in the overall sample, dreams of the worst event was 7.21% and dreams of separation was 1.73%. Prevalence rates of all dream variables varied by racial and ethnic group membership, gender, and age. Odds ratios were also calculated for the three variables of interest by racial and ethnic group with significant differences emerging. Women had significantly higher rates of disturbing dreams in all variables assessed (p < 0.01). Older adults reported significantly lower rates of disturbing dreams compared to younger and middle-aged adults (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study establishes prevalence rates for disturbing dreams in a diverse sample of US adults. Understanding the prevalence can aid in reducing barriers to care for evidence-based treatments currently underutilized.

Citations in the library

Explore topics