Skip to content

Mindfulness and psychological health in practitioners of Japanese martial arts: a cross-sectional study.

Hiromitsu Miyata, Daisuke Kobayashi, Akifumi Sonoda, Hibiki Motoike, Saki Akatsuka

BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation December 7, 2020 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-020-00225-5 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional questionnaire survey Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Population Practitioners of Japanese martial arts with 0.6-35.0 years of practice and demographically matched non-practitioners
Topics Depression Meditation
Keywords Japanese Subjective well-being Martial arts Dispositional mindfulness Long-term practice
Key findings Martial arts practitioners scored significantly higher on mindfulness and subjective well-being and lower on depression than non-practitioners. Among practitioners, longer practice duration and higher daily practice frequency significantly predicted higher mindfulness and psychological health. The authors argue these results support the view that multiple Eastern mind-body practices may be associated with similar desirable psychological outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Empirical data have suggested that mind-body practices that originated in Eastern traditions can cause desirable changes to psychological traits, the brain, somatic physiological functions, etc. Martial arts in Japan refer to the physical/mental practices that were developed based on historical combat techniques. Today, martial arts are considered activities that seek embodiment and/or mind-body unity, as well as sports. Empirical studies involving practitioners of Japanese martial arts to date remain scarce.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey using a cross-sectional design to examine whether the practice of martial arts based on Japanese traditions are associated with mindfulness and psychological health. Participants included a population of practitioners of martial arts with a practice period of 0.6-35.0 years, and non-practitioners matched for demographic variables.

Results: Compared with the non-practitioners, the practitioners of martial arts had significantly higher scores for mindfulness and subjective well-being and lower scores for depression. Among the practitioners of martial arts, a longer period of practice or a higher frequency of daily practice significantly predicted higher mindfulness and psychological health.

Conclusions: The results obtained are consistent with those previously obtained for other populations of Japanese contemplatives, and support the view that practice of multiple Eastern mind-body practices might be associated with similar desirable psychological outcomes. A cross-sectional design has limitations in that it is difficult to determine the effect of continued practice, so that a longitudinal study that follows the same practitioners over time is desired in the future enquiry.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics