Skip to content

Mind-Body Practices and Self-Enhancement: Direct Replications of Gebauer et al.'s (2018) Experiments 1 and 2.

Thomas I Vaughan-Johnston, Jill A Jacobson, Alex Prosserman, Emily Sanders

Psychological Science August 13, 2021 DOI: 10.1177/0956797621997366 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Preregistered replication (field study and multiwave intervention) Peer reviewed
Sample size 397
Population Canadian yoga students (Experiment 1) and Canadian university students (Experiment 2)
Interventions Yoga Meditation
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Yoga Self concept Students Canada Replication Open data Self-enhancement Open materials Preregistered Self-centrality
Key points The replications support Gebauer et al.'s conclusion that mind-body practices increase self-enhancement, and an integrative analysis of original and replication data supported all of the original conclusions. The self-centrality effects were not clearly replicated in either experiment, though the authors suggest measurement and sampling differences may explain this. The authors argue the findings oppose the ego-quieting perspective and support the self-centrality interpretation.

Abstract

Mind-body practices such as yoga and meditation are often believed to instill a "quiet ego," entailing less self-enhancement. In two experiments, however, Gebauer et al. (2018) demonstrated that mind-body practices may actually increase self-enhancement, particularly because such practices become self-central bases for self-esteem. We conducted preregistered replications of both of Gebauer et al.'s experiments. Experiment 1 was a field study of Canadian yoga students (N = 97), and Experiment 2 was a multiwave meditation intervention among Canadian university students (N = 300). Our results supported Gebauer et al.'s original conclusions that mind-body practices increase self-enhancement. Although the self-centrality effects were not clearly replicated in either experiment, we found evidence that measurement and sampling differences may explain this discrepancy. Moreover, an integrative data analysis of the original and the replication data strongly supported all of Gebauer et al.'s conclusions. In short, we provide new evidence against the ego-quieting perspective and in support of the self-centrality interpretation of mind-body practices.

Citations in the library

Explore topics