Skip to content

Susceptibility to auditory hallucinations is associated with spontaneous but not directed modulation of top-down expectations for speech

Ben Alderson-Day, Jamie Moffatt, César F. Lima, Saloni Krishnan, Charles Fernyhough, S. Scott, S. Denton, Ivy Yi Ting Leong, Alena D Oncel, Yuli Wu, Zehra Gurbuz, S. Evans

Neuroscience of Consciousness February 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niac002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study (four experiments) Peer reviewed
Sample size 353
Population Healthy participants listening to ambiguous speech stimuli
Key findings Across four experiments, hallucination-proneness was unrelated to top-down modulation of perception by explicit prior knowledge (Experiments 1a, 1b, and 2), but in Experiment 3 it predicted spontaneous identification of speech and recall of hidden words in sine-vocoded speech heard without prior knowledge. The authors argue this supports a pre-existing tendency to spontaneously use prior knowledge in people prone to auditory verbal hallucinations rather than a sensitivity to temporary expectation changes.

Abstract

Abstract Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs)—or hearing voices—occur in clinical and non-clinical populations, but their mechanisms remain unclear. Predictive processing models of psychosis have proposed that hallucinations arise from an over-weighting of prior expectations in perception. It is unknown, however, whether this reflects (i) a sensitivity to explicit modulation of prior knowledge or (ii) a pre-existing tendency to spontaneously use such knowledge in ambiguous contexts. Four experiments were conducted to examine this question in healthy participants listening to ambiguous speech stimuli. In experiments 1a (n = 60) and 1b (n = 60), participants discriminated intelligible and unintelligible sine-wave speech before and after exposure to the original language templates (i.e. a modulation of expectation). No relationship was observed between top-down modulation and two common measures of hallucination-proneness. Experiment 2 (n = 99) confirmed this pattern with a different stimulus—sine-vocoded speech (SVS)—that was designed to minimize ceiling effects in discrimination and more closely model previous top-down effects reported in psychosis. In Experiment 3 (n = 134), participants were exposed to SVS without prior knowledge that it contained speech (i.e. naïve listening). AVH-proneness significantly predicted both pre-exposure identification of speech and successful recall for words hidden in SVS, indicating that participants could actually decode the hidden signal spontaneously. Altogether, these findings support a pre-existing tendency to spontaneously draw upon prior knowledge in healthy people prone to AVH, rather than a sensitivity to temporary modulations of expectation. We propose a model of clinical and non-clinical hallucinations, across auditory and visual modalities, with testable predictions for future research.

Citations in the library