Skip to content

A synthesis of meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions in pain.

Louise Sharpe, Bethany Richmond, Rachel E. Menzies, Daniel Forrest, Geert Crombez, Ben Colagiuri

Pain August 14, 2023 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002997 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Umbrella review Peer reviewed
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)
Topics Anxiety Meditation
Keywords Humans Anxiety disorders Somatoform disorders Meta-analysis as topic Pain management
Key findings Across 21 meta-analyses including 127 unique studies, mindfulness-based interventions showed effects on pain severity, anxiety, and depression but not pain interference or disability. Only fibromyalgia and headache benefited significantly when conditions were analyzed separately, and effects on pain severity appeared only against passive, not active, controls. The authors argue that individual meta-analyses may have overestimated MBI efficacy and that MBIs should not be considered a panacea.

Abstract

Abstract: Mindfulness interventions have become popular in recent decades, with many trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses of the impact of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on pain. Although many meta-analyses provide support for MBIs, the results are more mixed than they at first appear. The aim of this umbrella review was to determine the strength of evidence for MBIs by synthesizing available meta-analyses in pain. We conducted a systematic search in 5 databases and extracted data from published meta-analyses as the unit of analysis. For each outcome, we reported the range of effect sizes observed across studies and identified the largest meta-analysis as the "representative" study. We separately analysed effect sizes for different pain conditions, different types of MBIs, different control groups, and different outcomes. We identified 21 meta-analyses that included 127 unique studies. According to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review ratings, the meta-analyses ranged from very strong to weak. Overall, there was an impact of MBIs on pain severity, anxiety, and depression but not pain interference or disability. When conditions were considered in isolation, only fibromyalgia and headache benefited significantly from MBIs. Mindfulness-based interventions were more efficacious for pain severity than passive control conditions but not active control conditions. Only pain severity and anxiety were affected by MBIs at follow-up. Overall, our results suggest that individual meta-analyses of MBIs may have overestimated the efficacy of MBIs in a range of conditions. Mindfulness-based interventions likely have a role in pain management but should not be considered a panacea.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 6

and 1 more in the library

Cites 21

and 16 more in the library

Explore topics