Skip to content

Stress appraisal and emotion regulation mediate the association between mindfulness and affect in cancer patients: Differential mechanisms for positive and negative affect.

Puttichai Tungtong, Adelita V Ranchor, Maya J. Schroevers

Psycho-Oncology August 16, 2023 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6201 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 245
Population Cancer patients
Measures Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised: Short Form (SPSI-R:S), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ), COPE
Topics Anxiety Depression Meditation
Keywords Humans Neoplasms Cross-sectional studies Adaptation, psychological Stress, psychological Affect Adult Middle aged Female Surveys and questionnaires Rumination, cognitive Emotional regulation Cancer Oncology Coping Mediation Positive reappraisal Positive refocusing
Key findings Higher mindfulness was associated with greater positive affect, mediated by stress appraisal and positive reappraisal, and with lower negative affect, mediated by stress appraisal and rumination. The authors propose that mindfulness may support cancer patients' affect through adaptive stress appraisal and coping involving more positive and less negative thinking.

Abstract

Objective: Cancer patients are at an increased risk for affective problems, including feelings of anxiety and depression. Mindfulness has been linked to an array of benefits for affective functioning in various populations including cancer patients, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship are still poorly understood. Based on emotion-regulation and stress-coping models, this study examined the potential mediating role of stress appraisal and coping strategies in the associations between mindfulness and cancer patients' positive and negative affect.

Methods: For this cross-sectional study, 245 cancer patients completed self-report questionnaires measuring mindfulness (FFMQ), positive and negative affect (PANAS), stress appraisal (SPSI-R:S), coping through positive reappraisal and positive refocusing (CERQ), rumination (RRQ), and distraction (COPE). Serial mediation analyses were conducted using the regression-based bootstrapping method.

Results: Higher levels of mindfulness were associated with higher levels of positive affect; this relationship was mediated via stress appraisal and positive reappraisal. We also found an indirect effect from mindfulness directly via positive reappraisal to positive affect. In addition, higher levels of mindfulness were negatively associated with negative affect; this relationship was mediated via stress appraisal and rumination, with also an indirect effect from mindfulness directly via stress appraisal to negative affect.

Conclusions: Results suggest that stress appraisal and distinct coping strategies mediate the relationship between mindfulness and affect. Mindfulness may provide benefits for cancer patients' affect by allowing adaptive stress appraisal and ways of coping through more positive and less negative thinking.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics