Access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among patients with treatment-resistant depression covered by private or public insurance.
Current Medical Research and Opinion August 3, 2023 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2239045 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Retrospective observational cohort study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 535 |
| Population | Adults with treatment-resistant depression and at least one esketamine nasal spray pharmacy claim in a US real-world insurance claims database |
| Intervention | Esketamine nasal spray |
| Duration | Mean follow-up of 11.8 months |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine |
| Key findings | Initial access to esketamine nasal spray was frequently blocked: only 34.6% of first pharmacy claims were approved, with rejections often due to lack of plan coverage, claim errors, or prior authorization requirements, though approval reached 85.2% by the second session. Among 273 patients who initiated esketamine, use generally deviated from label recommendations, with only 17.6% completing induction per label; most of those who did complete label-recommended induction continued to maintenance. |
Abstract
Objective: To describe access and real-world use patterns of esketamine nasal spray among adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with private or public insurance.
Methods: Adults with ≥1 claim for esketamine nasal spray were selected from Clarivate's Real World Data product (January 2016-March 2021). Patients with evidence of TRD initiating esketamine (index date) after 05 March 2019 were included. Esketamine access, as measured by pharmacy claim approval rate for each treatment session, and use patterns were described post-index (follow-up period).
Results: Among 535 patients with pharmacy claims for esketamine nasal spray (mean age 49.1 years; 65.4% females), 534 had the first esketamine claim being a pharmacy claim, of which 34.6% were approved, 46.3% were rejected, and 19.1% were abandoned. Main reasons for rejection included "claim not covered by plan" (57.1%), "claim errors" (52.6%), and "prior authorization required" (22.7%). The approval rate increased to 85.2% by the second esketamine treatment session. A total of 273 patients initiated esketamine (mean age 49.3 years; 66.3% females). Patients had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 11.8 ± 13.3 esketamine sessions over a mean ± SD of 11.8 ± 6.4 months; 47.6% of patients completed ≥8 sessions (i.e. the number of sessions in induction phase) over a mean ± SD of 80.1 ± 71.9 days (per label, 28 days); 48 (17.6%) patients completed induction per label, and among them 93.8% continued treatment.
Conclusions: Initial access to esketamine nasal spray may be hindered by prior authorization or claim filing errors. Among patients who initiated esketamine, treatment compliance generally deviates from label recommendations; yet, most of those who received induction per label successfully transition to maintenance with esketamine.
Comparable studies
Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.
Citations in the library
Cited by 10
- Esketamine Monotherapy in Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry July 2, 2025
- Efficacy of Esketamine among patients with treatment resistant depression in a 'real world' health-care setting in Israel. Journal of Psychiatric Research June 1, 2024
- Treatment Patterns, Acute Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs of Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Completing Induction Phase of Esketamine in the United States. Drugs - real world outcomes June 1, 2024
- Impact of social determinants of health on esketamine nasal spray initiation among patients with treatment-resistant depression in the United States. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy 2025
- Understanding profiles of patients with treatment-resistant depression by stringency of health plan prior authorization criteria for approval of esketamine nasal spray. Current Medical Research and Opinion September 1, 2024
and 5 more in the library
Cites 4
- Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study American Journal of Psychiatry May 21, 2019
- Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression JAMA Psychiatry June 5, 2019
- Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1) The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology July 9, 2019
- Esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression: the real-world experience in the French cohort early-access programme. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice November 2022