Evaluating the Risk of Psilocybin for the Treatment of Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review of Published Case Studies
David E. Gard, Mollie Pleet, Ellen Bradley, Andrew Penn, Matthew L. Gallenstein, Lauren S. Riley, Meghan DellaCrosse, Emily M. Garfinkle, Erin E. Michalak, Joshua Woolley
medRxiv April 7, 2021 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.02.21254838 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review of published case histories Open-label |
|---|---|
| Population | Individuals described in published case histories of adverse reactions to classic psychedelics, including cases involving mania or manic-like behavior |
| Interventions | Psilocybin classic psychedelics |
| Topics | Depression Psilocybin |
| Key findings | The authors conclude there is some evidence that psilocybin and similar substances can activate mania, but that this risk does not appear strong or overwhelming. They argue that a careful prospective study, such as an open-label treatment protocol with careful controls, is warranted for treating depression in bipolar disorder. |
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Given the treatment limitations of depression in bipolar disorder, we evaluated the known risks of using psilocybin (and similar substances) in this population, including a systematic assessment of published case histories, to assess the risk of psilocybin as a treatment of depression in bipolar disorder. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of case studies published through December 31, 2020 was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and PsychInfo, focusing on classic psychedelics and case studies or case histories. Study Selection: Our search terms resulted in 541 hits, of which 43 were non-duplicates of case studies with individuals having an adverse reaction to a psychedelic substance. Of those, 15 case studies indicated some form of adverse event involving mania or manic like behavior that persisted beyond the acute intoxication of the substance. Data Extraction: Two independent evaluators assessed all possible cases, focusing on manic behavior based on DSM criteria. Two separate evaluators convened to evaluate cases where the case information was unclear.
Results: Of the 15 cases, four involved psilocybin, two cases involved individuals with a likely pre-existing diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and three involved individuals without a history of polysubstance abuse or concurrent polysubstance use.
Conclusions: We conclude that there is some evidence of risk of activating mania with these substances, but that the risk does not appear to be strong or overwhelming. Instead a careful prospective study, such as an open-label treatment protocol with careful controls, appears warranted in this population.
Comparable studies
Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin for depression, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... | 2020 | Systematic review | n = 188 |
| The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression | 2020 | Meta-analysis | n = 117 |
| Psychedelics in the treatment of unipolar mood disorders: a systematic review Patients with broadly defined unipolar mood disorders | 2016 | Systematic review | n = 423 |
| Psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in studies of psychedelic therapy for depressive symptoms (Major... | 2023 | Systematic review with meta-analysis | n = 14 |
| Serotonergic hallucinogens in the treatment of anxiety and depression in patients suffering from a life-threatening disease: A systematic review. Patients with life-threatening diseases and symptoms of anxiety or depression | 2018 | Systematic review | n = 445 |