Skip to content

The Emergence of “Esoteric” as a Comparative Category

Julian Strube

Implicit Religion July 20, 2023 DOI: 10.1558/imre.23260 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Case report Peer reviewed
Citations 1
Key points Argues that the notion of "esoteric" has operated as a de facto comparative category since the seventeenth century and that restricting study to a preconceived "Western esoteric corpus" has obscured its historical use across the Arabic and Persianate world, India, and East Asia. Proposes a decentered historiography that understands "esotericism" and "religion" as products of entangled historical exchanges rather than unilateral Western diffusion.

Abstract

This case study contributes to ongoing debates about religious comparativism by focusing on the emergence of the notion of “esoteric” as a de facto comparative category since the seventeenth century. Scholars have so far restricted their studies to a preconceived “Western esoteric corpus” that limited our view on the majority of source material. This obfuscated the fact that notions such as “esoteric,” “gnosis,” or “Cabala” have been widely employed historically to discuss subjects ranging from the Arabic and Persianate world via India to East Asia. Since the eighteenth century, “esoteric” language formed an integral part of orientalist scholarship, which explains its omnipresence in (South) Asianist scholarship today. This immediately relates to broader issues of religious comparativism: I argue for the necessity of a decentered historiography to understand the development of categories such as “esotericism” and “religion,” not as a unilateral process of “Western” diffusion and projection but through entangled historical exchanges. Based on the approach of global religious history, I provide preliminary insights into what conditioned and structured these exchanges.