A Model Solution: On the Compatibility of Predictive Processing and Embodied Cognition
L. Kersten
Minds and Machines November 29, 2022 DOI: 10.1007/s11023-022-09617-7 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Larry Laudan's "problem solving model" of scientific progress can clarify outstanding challenges facing accounts of predictive processing and embodied cognition compatibility, and that this model carries further implications for both approaches. |
Abstract
Predictive processing (PP) and embodied cognition (EC) have emerged as two influential approaches within cognitive science in recent years. Not only have PP and EC been heralded as “revolutions” and “paradigm shifts” but they have motivated a number of new and interesting areas of research. This has prompted some to wonder how compatible the two views might be. This paper looks to weigh in on the issue of PP-EC compatibility. After outlining two recent proposals, I argue that further clarity can be achieved on the issue by considering a model of scientific progress. Specifically, I suggest that Larry Laudan’s “problem solving model” can provide important insights into a number of outstanding challenges that face existing accounts of PP-EC compatibility. I conclude by outlining additional implications of the problem solving model for PP and EC more generally.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
Cites 16
- The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition Oxford University Press eBooks September 13, 2018
- An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence Frontiers in Psychology 2012
- Evolving Enactivism The MIT Press eBooks May 19, 2017
- A tale of two densities: active inference is enactive inference. Adaptive Behavior August 1, 2020
- The Poverty of Embodied Cognition Psychonomic Bulletin & Review June 9, 2016
and 11 more in the library