Skip to content

Musikken og tapet av transcendens

Svein Aage Christoffersen

Musikk og religion: Tekster om musikk i religion og religion i musikk 2022 DOI: 10.23865/noasp.177.ch7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Protestant theology's separation of eros from agape and rejection of metaphysics reduced music to a mere tool for communicating God's word, contrary to Luther. Proposes instead that music, understood through "immanent transcendence" and "self-transcendence," can "arrest" and pull listeners beyond themselves, transforming eros and evoking gratitude received as creational grace.

Abstract

In the scientific secularisation of the modern worldview, music has lost its transcendent point of reference, taken for granted in pre-modern times. However, Protestant theology has contributed to this secularisation by a strict separation between (platonic) eros and (Christian) agape, and rejection of any kind of metaphysics. Consequently, and contrary to Martin Luther, music is from a theological point of view valued primarily as a convenient tool for communicating the word of God. This article takes a different course. Starting out with Peter Berger’s “signals of transcendence”, music is investigated as a kind of aesthetic experience from the point of view of “immanent transcendence” (Dorthe Jørgensen) and “self-transcendence” (Hans Joas). Aesthetic experience is not a kind of internal self-ignition, but “attachment” (Rita Felski), understood as an experience of being “arrested” and pulled beyond oneself by something external. In this kind of transcendence, there is a recognition of things valuable in themselves and a gratefulness that may be received as creational grace. From this point of view, music has a privileged position in its power not just to affect our emotions, but also to transform our eros.