Skip to content

Individual Differences in Meditation Outcomes

Ivana Buric, Inti A. Brazil, Valerie van Mulukom

The Oxford Handbook of Meditation November 10, 2020 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198808640.013.26 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Key findings The authors conclude that evidence linking participant characteristics to meditation outcomes is sparse and methodologically limited across personality, biological, illness-severity, and demographic domains. They recommend multilevel models and meta-regression to better integrate individual-difference variables into meditation research.

Abstract

Abstract Meditation generally has small to moderate effects on health and well-being, but some people experience greater benefits from meditation than others. What are the characteristics of the study participants or meditation students that lead to beneficial outcomes of meditation? This chapter adopts a multilevel approach to evaluate the evidence on the relationship between participant characteristics and individual differences in meditation outcomes across four sources of variability: personality and other psychological variables, biological variables, illness severity, and demographic factors. Research in the area is sparse and has several methodological shortcomings, thus the authors recommend the use of multilevel models and meta-regression as ways of properly incorporating the study of individual differences with other variables.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics