Skip to content

The causal mind: An affordance-based account of causal engagement

Ivar R. Kolvoort, Katrin Schulz, Erik Rietveld

Adaptive Behavior June 6, 2023 DOI: 10.1177/10597123231179486 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 1
Key points Argues that causal cognition is best understood as a situated, embodied, learned skill of selectively attending to ecological information tied to affordances, rather than as abstract reasoning. Proposes that causal judgments are embedded in sociocultural practices aimed at intervening in the world, and that this account addresses the causal selection problem and explains individual differences in causal perception and judgment.

Abstract

Causal cognition is a core aspect of how we deal with the world; however, existing psychological theories tend not to target intuitive causal engagement that is done in daily life. To fill this gap, we propose an Ecological-Enactive (E-E) affordance-based account of situated causal engagement, that is, causal judgments and perceptions. We develop this account to improve our understanding of this way of dealing with the world, which includes making progress on the causal selection problem, and to extend the scope of embodied cognitive science to causal cognition. We characterize identifying causes as selectively attending to the relevant ecological information to engage with relevant affordances, where these affordances are dependent on individual abilities. Based on this we construe causal engagement as based on a learned skill. Moreover, we argue that to understand judgments of causation as we make them in our daily lives, we need to see them as situated in sociocultural practices. Practices are about doing, and so this view helps us understand why people make these judgments so ubiquitously: to get things done, to provide an effective path to intervening in the world. Ultimately this view on causal engagement allows us to account for individual differences in causal perceptions, judgments, and selections by appealing to differences in learned skills and sociocultural practices.

Citations in the library

Explore topics