Skip to content

Acute Effects of Esketamine on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Associations with Psychopathological Traits by Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2)

Cristina Serritella, L. Iorio, F. Ferraiuolo, L. Catalano, R. De Biase, Daniele Riccio

European Psychiatry June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2026.11794 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression receiving intranasal esketamine at a mental health centre in Caserta, Italy
Intervention Intranasal esketamine
Measures MMPI-2, including Harris and Lingoes subscales
Topics Esketamine
Key findings Intranasal esketamine produced an acute, significant rise in blood pressure without affecting heart rate in ten patients. Blood pressure responses varied with MMPI-2 psychopathological profiles: hysteria and hypochondriasis were associated with lower readings, while paranoia, hypomania, and psychasthenia were associated with higher readings. The authors propose that psychopathological assessment be integrated into clinical monitoring to personalize esketamine protocols.

Abstract

Introduction: Intranasal esketamine provides a rapid therapeutic option for treatment-resistant depression but can induce transient blood pressure increases. The influence of psychopathological traits on these cardiovascular responses remains largely unexplored.

Objectives: The present study aims to investigate the acute effects of intranasal esketamine on systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate, and to examine their associations with psychopathological profiles as measured by the MMPI-2, including Harris and Lingoes subscales. Specifically, the study seeks to determine whether distinct psychopathological traits predict differential cardiovascular responses to esketamine administration.

Methods: Ten patients receiving esketamine treatment were assessed at the Mental Health Centre of Caserta (UOSM-12). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR, beats per minute) were measured immediately before administration (T0) and after administration (T1). Psychopathological traits were evaluated using the MMPI-2, including Harris and Lingoes subscales.

Results: The Friedman test revealed significant differences in physiological parameters (χ² = 39.772; df = 5; p < .001). Spearman correlations highlighted specific associations between psychopathological profiles and cardiovascular parameters. At baseline (T0), SBP was inversely correlated with Hysteria (Hy; ρ = -0.886; p = .019) and positively correlated with Paranoia (Pa; ρ = +0.886; p = .019); DBP was negatively associated with Hypochondriasis (Hs; ρ = -0.841; p = .036). After administration (T1), SBP showed negative correlations with Hy (ρ = -0.829; p = .042) and positive correlations with Hypomania (Ma; ρ = +0.829; p = .042), while DBP was positively associated with Psychasthenia (Pt; ρ = +0.886; p = .019). Harris and Lingoes’ subscales further refined these patterns: Hy3 (Fatigue/Malaise) was negatively correlated with HR at T1; Hy5 (Inhibition of Aggression) was negatively associated with HR at both T0 and T1, as well as with SBP at T1. Conversely, Pa1 (Persecutory Ideas), Ma1 (Amorality), and Ma2 (Psychomotor Acceleration) were positively correlated with SBP at T1.

Conclusions: Intranasal esketamine causes an acute and significant increase in blood pressure, without affecting heart rate. However, cardiovascular responses are heterogeneous and modulated by specific psychopathological profiles: anxious-hypochondriacal and inhibitory traits are associated with attenuated responses, while persecutory thoughts, psychasthenia, hypomania and subscales of amoral behaviour/psychomotor acceleration predict an increase in blood pressure. These results suggest the importance of integrating systematic psychopathological assessment into clinical monitoring and personalising therapeutic protocols with esketamine. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Explore topics