Skip to content

Beyond symptom reduction: Intranasal esketamine is associated with improved quality of life in treatment-resistant depression.

J Psychiatr Res September 7, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.09.005 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 35
Population Outpatients with treatment-resistant depression
Interventions Intranasal esketamine oral antidepressant
Duration 6 months
Measures Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)
Topics Depression Esketamine
Key findings Intranasal esketamine combined with an oral antidepressant was associated with significant improvements in depressive symptoms, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and quality of life over 6 months, with the quality-of-life improvement exceeding the threshold for clinical meaningfulness. No statistically significant differences were detected between SSRI and SNRI subgroups in this exploratory comparison.

Abstract

Objective: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is associated with severe functional impairment, poor quality of life, and increased suicide risk. This study evaluated the effectiveness of intranasal esketamine on depressive symptoms, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and quality of life in patients with TRD, exploring whether outcomes differed according to concomitant antidepressant class (SSRI vs. SNRI).

Methods: Thirty-five outpatients with TRD received intranasal esketamine combined with an oral antidepressant. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Mixed Models for Repeated Measures and Generalized Estimating Equations were applied.

Results: Significant improvements over time were observed in depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and quality of life as measured by the Q-LES-Q (all p < .001). Suicidal ideation significantly decreased during follow-up (p = .025). Improvement in Q-LES-Q scores exceeded the threshold for clinical meaningfulness. No significant differences emerged between SSRI and SNRI subgroups across outcome measures.

Conclusions: Intranasal esketamine was associated with significant improvements in depressive symptoms, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and quality of life over 6 months in patients with TRD, with no statistically significant differences detected across antidepressant subgroups in this exploratory comparison.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Explore topics

By condition and practice