Is the Mind More Powerful Than the Heart? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Loving-Kindness Interventions
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Preregistered |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 203 |
| Population | Adults participating in a preregistered randomized controlled trial of loving-kindness training |
| Interventions | Loving-kindness meditation loving-kindness reflection |
| Duration | Pre, post, and follow-up |
| Key findings | Planned contrasts suggested that loving-kindness reflection produced prosocial effects on explicit social attitudes, aggressive behaviour, cognitive accessibility of a recent altruistic behaviour, and willingness to help, while meditation produced effects on positive affect; both produced effects on self-reported compassion. The authors conclude that reflecting on loving-kindness concepts may provide more robust and reliable prosocial effects than meditating on them, though benefits were limited and did not extend to charity donations. |
Abstract
Context. Many spiritual traditions, like Buddhism, emphasize the importance of developing feelings of love and altruism toward others regardless of circumstances, but doing so can be challenging, especially in situations where individuals have little self-control resources, for example due to cognitive fatigue. These traditions offer techniques to train the mind, such as loving-kindness meditation, in order to facilitate the achievement of this altruistic goal. However, the evidence in favour of the prosocial benefits of loving-kindness meditation is scant and at times conflicting. Methods. To investigate the long-term effects of loving-kindness training on prosociality and aggression, we investigated changes in a range of prosocial variables at pre, post, and follow-up in a preregistered randomized controlled trial comparing three groups: loving-kindness meditation (N = 58), loving-kindness reflection (N = 53), and waitlist control (N = 92). Furthermore, to establish the robustness of the loving-kindness training relative to challenging circumstances such as cognitive fatigue, we introduced an ego depletion task at post-testing. Results. Planned contrasts analyses suggested effects on positive affect only for the meditation group, on self-reported compassion for both the meditation and reflection groups, and explicit social attitudes, aggressive behaviour, cognitive accessibility of a recent altruistic behaviour, willingness to help, only for the reflection group. There were no other group differences in attitudes toward aggression, dehumanization, implicit aggression, or charity donations. Moderation analyses revealed three-way interactions between group, implicit attitudes, and ego depletion, as hypothesized, but only for compassion and cognitive accessibility of a recent altruistic behaviour. Discussion. In conclusion, results suggest that the effects of reflecting on loving-kindness concepts provide robust and reliable prosocial effects, perhaps more than meditating on those concepts. Even those benefits are limited to certain behaviours, cognitions, or affects, and they do not generalize to many common behaviours such as charity donations. However, ego depletion seems to only moderate implicit attitudes when loving-kindness is embodied through meditation and not when it is confined to the intellectual mind.