Skip to content

Brute Fact Cosmology and the Fundamentality of Consciousness

Ben Schermbrucker

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia October 31, 2024 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2024_80_3_0863 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that fundamental physical things are necessarily ontologically brute, that science's candidate fundamentals are impermissibly complex, and that brute fact metaphysics permits entertaining simpler fundamentals — with consciousness, understood as the intrinsic nature of matter, proposed as the most plausible such fundamental. The author remains agnostic about its empirical verification while noting emerging experimental paradigms that could in principle test it.

Abstract

What is the fundamental nature of the physical universe? This paper generates new insights into this question through examining how brute fact metaphysics intersects with our best cosmological theories of the universe’s origin. To do this, I first make the case that fundamental physical things are – by necessity – ontologically brute. Ontological bruteness, I maintain, provides a rationale for the counterfactual claim that there is no reason why a fundamental has one physical identity rather than another. The paper then gives an overview of modern cosmology. This empirically oriented analysis is enjoined to a metaphysical argument that – since science’s candidate fundamentals are impermissibly complex – we can appeal to brute fact metaphysics to meaningfully entertain the possibility of simpler fundamentals. The paper then investigates a particular simple fundamental I take to be most plausible: consciousness (understood as the intrinsic nature of matter). This discussion draws on cosmic-level evolution and panpsychism. While I remain agnostic about whether consciousness’ instantiation in fundamental-level physics and cosmology will be empirically verified, the paper draws attention to a number of emerging experimental paradigms that can – at least in principle – contribute to this project.