Consciousness and Information as the Fabric of Nature
Joram Beda
March 5, 2026 DOI: 10.4324/9781003740766-4 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that information may be part of the world's load-bearing physical architecture rather than only a human description of it. Cites quantum biology as evidence that living systems can sustain coherence, tunnelling, and spin-dependent chemistry on biologically relevant timescales, while cautioning that these effects do not explain consciousness. Proposes that information-theoretic principles may shape what the known forces can do, inviting testable pathways between mind, matter, and informational regularities. |
Abstract
This chapter explores a simple but provocative idea: What if “information” is not just what we write down about the world but part of the world’s load-bearing architecture? We begin with consciousness as lived fact—how it feels to be aware—and set that alongside scientific accounts, from global workspace theory and integrated information theory to carefully framed quantum proposals. We then follow the evidence where it is strongest: quantum biology shows that, in specific niches, living systems can sustain coherence, tunnelling, and spin-dependent chemistry on biologically relevant timescales. These effects do not explain consciousness, but they remind us that life is an expert in harvesting structure from noise. Read this way, information becomes a physical resource to be acquired, protected, and transformed under thermodynamic constraints. The argument then widens: from photosynthetic complexes to black-hole horizons, from dendritic trees to rivers and roads, similar patterns of routing and constraint appear across scales. Rather than proclaiming a new “fifth force,” we ask a sharper question: Do information-theoretic principles shape what the known forces can do? The result is a measured synthesis—philosophically open, empirically anchored—inviting testable pathways between mind, matter, and the informational regularities that seem to govern both.