Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of ketamine maintenance therapy in treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review of treatment protocols and clinical outcomes.

A. M. Al-Garni, Gustavo Vazquez, Tariq Alotibi, Carolina Hernandorena, Yuliya Knyahnytska

Journal of Affective Disorders October 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120475 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression
Interventions Ketamine maintenance therapy psychotherapy
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Key findings Across 11 studies, ketamine maintenance therapy for treatment-resistant depression was associated with lower relapse rates with regular dosing than variable protocols (27.3% vs 45.6%), better response among patients under 45 and those with depression duration under 2 years, and improved maintenance with concurrent psychotherapy (hazard ratio 0.72 for relapse). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, with a 7.2% discontinuation rate.

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a significant therapeutic challenge, as conventional treatments demonstrate limited efficacy. Although ketamine's acute antidepressant effects are well-documented, the role of maintenance therapy remains understudied. We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy, safety, and optimal implementation strategies of ketamine maintenance therapy in TRD.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched major databases for studies published between January 2020 and November 2024 that examined ketamine maintenance therapy in TRD. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Regular maintenance dosing showed superior outcomes compared to variable protocols (relapse rates: 27.3 % vs 45.6 %). Younger age (<45 years) and shorter duration of depression (<2 years) predicted better response rates. Concurrent psychotherapy improved treatment maintenance (HR: 0.72 for relapse). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate, resulting in a 7.2 % discontinuation rate.

Conclusions: Ketamine maintenance therapy shows promise as a treatment option for TRD, with regular dosing schedules and early intervention associated with optimal outcomes. While safety profiles are reassuring, standardized protocols and careful patient selection remain essential. Future research should focus on determining the optimal maintenance duration and identifying reliable biomarkers for treatment response.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta‐analysis People with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder receiving ketamine infusion 2015 Meta-analysis n = 437

Explore topics

By condition and practice