Skip to content

Overview: clinical and physiological comparison of meditation with other self-control strategies.

D H Shapiro

American Journal of Psychiatry March 1982 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.139.3.267 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Key findings The review addresses whether meditation is clinically and physiologically distinct from other self-control strategies such as biofeedback, hypnosis, and progressive relaxation, with particular attention to claims of meditation's "uniqueness" as a clinical intervention and to adverse effects. It concludes by offering suggestions and guidelines for future research; no specific comparative outcomes are stated in the abstract.

Abstract

In 1977 the American Psychiatric Association called for a critical examination of the clinical effectiveness of meditation. The author provides a review of the literature bearing on clinical and physiological comparisons of meditation with other self-control strategies. He begins by providing a definition of mediation and then cites the literature comparing mediation with such self-regulation strategies as biofeedback, hypnosis, and progressive relaxation. He pays particular attention to the "uniqueness" of mediation as a clinical intervention strategy a well as the adverse effects of meditation. Finally, he offers suggestions and guidelines for future research.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics