Skip to content

Linguistic Phenomena and Language Selection in the REM Dreams of German‐English Bilinguals

David Foulkes, Barbara Meier, Inge Strauch, Nancy H. Kerr, Laura Bradley, Michael Hollifield

International Journal of Psychology December 1, 1993 DOI: 10.1080/00207599308246969 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 16
Population German-English bilinguals: native English speakers living in Zürich and native German speakers living in Atlanta
Duration Four nonconsecutive nights per participant
Citations 10
Key findings The language spoken during laboratory sessions directly influenced language selection in participants' dreams. Judged appropriateness of language choice to imagined events was very high for presleep thought samples and high for REM dreams. Waking appropriateness to imagined situations was more strongly related to language selection than was the language reference of the supposed sources of those situations.

Abstract

Sixteen German‐English bilinguals were studied in a sleep laboratory for four nonconsecutive nights each. Half were native English speakers living in Zürich, and half native German speakers living in Atlanta. Presleep thought samples were solicited each evening and REM dream reports each night; subjects judged the waking appropriateness of their imagined speech and language phenomena, and also identified waking sources of their dream imagery, the following mornings. Incidences of dreaming and of speech therein generally were similar to those of monolinguals. Whether sessions were conducted in German (two nights) or English (two nights) did directly influence language selection in subjects' dreams. Judged appropriateness of language selection to imagined events was very high for thought samples, and high for REM dreams. Sources for thought samples were generally consonant with the language dominant at study site; for REM dreams this relationship was considerably weaker. Judged waking appropriateness to imagined situations was more strongly related to language selection than was the language reference of the supposed sources of those situations.