Skip to content

Physical motion in dreams: One measure of three theories.

Helene Sophrin Porte, J. Allan Hobson

Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1996 DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.3.329 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 29
Key points Argues that dream motor data conflict with Freud's explanation of dream movement and with a distributed activation explanation, while coinciding with an activation-synthesis hypothesis. Proposes that dreamed motion may have functional importance and that this physiologic approach may be relevant to psychopathological dreaming.

Abstract

As a normal psychological event, dreaming is an object of fascination and of conflicting explanation. In biopsychological terms, this article compares 3 explanations of 1 salient feature of dream cognition. Physical movement can be measured in dream reports, can be understood in physiologic terms, and can provide a focus for comparing dream theories. In addition, dreamed motion may have functional importance. The authors discuss dream motor data that conflict with Freud's explanation of dream movement and with a distributed activation explanation but coincide with an activation-synthesis hypothesis. Because physiologic models of sleep intersect with physiologic models of psychopathology, this approach may be relevant to psychopathological dreaming.

Citations in the library

Explore topics