Further Applications of the Implied Directive Utilized by Milton Erickson, M.D. in the Continuing Integration of Quantum Physics with Clinical Hypnosis
Clinical Reviews & Cases June 30, 2026 DOI: 10.33425/2689-1069.1078 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Milton Erickson's resistance protocol and clinical hypnosis show parallels with major quantum physics concepts, particularly through Erickson's use of inferences, opposites, frame of reference, and time. Proposes that the implied directive is a subset of all inferences and that inferences in hypnotherapy facilitate 'yes sets,' creative attention, and bridges to novelty. Draws parallels between Erickson and Poincare regarding the unconscious, time, and permission. |
Abstract
The primary focus of this article is to illustrate how Milton Erickson M.D.’s consciousness of appreciation reflected in his resistance protocol advanced the integration of clinical hypnosis with Quantum Physics. Numerous examples will be provided that show how Erickson’s interventions had parallels with the major quantum variables and concepts. Erickson’s appreciation of inferences, opposites, and frame of reference will be highlighted in his utilization of time in his treatment interventions. A review of efforts to integrate Quantum Physics with Psychology will emphasize the overlaps between Erickson and the French mathematician and physicist Poincare in terms of the value of the unconscious, time and permission. Time’s role in the evolution of hypnosis and Quantum Physics will complement the integration section. The implied directive will be explored in the context of it being a subset of the general set of all inferences. A detailed summary will be provided of the inferences operating in a hypnotherapeutic setting in terms of their value in facilitating bridges to novelty, ‘yes sets’ and the creative focusing of attention.