Measuring beliefs about the malleability of mindfulness skills: Validation of the Turkish version of the mindfulness mindset scale.
Esma Nur Gözütok, Ahmet Serhat Gözütok
Acta Psychologica August 21, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107661 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Psychometric validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 532 |
| Population | Turkish undergraduates |
| Measures | Mindfulness Mindset Scale (MMS) |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Item response theory Measurement invariance Implicit theories Psychometric validation Mindfulness mindset |
| Key points | The Turkish Mindfulness Mindset Scale shows initial psychometric support: it was primarily unidimensional after modeling shared variance between two attention items, had acceptable internal consistency, and functioned similarly across women and men without evidence of item bias, though the small male subsample limits that conclusion. Scores related modestly to a fixed creativity mindset but showed little relation to trait mindfulness or general distress, suggesting the scale captures a distinct belief about the trainability of mindfulness skills. |
Abstract
Mindfulness-based interventions produce uneven benefits across individuals, and one underexamined source of this variation is whether people believe mindfulness skills can be trained or are essentially fixed. The Mindfulness Mindset Scale (MMS) was developed to measure this belief, but it has not been examined in Turkish-speaking samples. This study adapted the MMS into Turkish through forward-backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. A total of 532 Turkish undergraduates then completed the Turkish MMS together with additional measures used to examine its construct validity. Psychometric evidence was examined at both the scale and item levels using classical test theory and item response theory. The scale was primarily unidimensional once the shared variance between two attention items was accounted for, and internal consistency was acceptable. Items differed in how sharply they separated respondents, and the scale measured most precisely at moderate levels of the belief. The scale functioned similarly for women and men, with no evidence of item bias, although the small male subsample limits this conclusion. Scores were modestly related to a fixed creativity mindset but showed little relation to trait mindfulness or general distress, suggesting that the MMS captures a distinct belief about trainability. The Turkish MMS addresses a measurement gap in the cross-cultural study of mindfulness mindsets and provides researchers in Türkiye with a brief instrument for examining how beliefs about trainability relate to engagement and other practice-related outcomes. The present findings provide initial psychometric support for the Turkish MMS, although the scope of this evidence is limited by the characteristics of the study sample.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Meta-analytic evidence for effects of mindfulness training on dimensions of self-reported dispositional mindfulness. Psychological Assessment 2016
- Towards an Individual Differences Perspective in Mindfulness Training Research: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Frontiers in Psychology May 19, 2020
- Effects of Mindfulness on Psychological Health: A Review of Empirical Studies Clinical Psychology Review May 13, 2011
and 1 more in the library