Skip to content

Subjective Experiences of Space and Time: Self, Sensation, and Phenomenal Time

Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal

Nature Precedings September 10, 2008 DOI: 10.1038/npre.2008.2272.1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 5
Key points Argues that three materialistic models of consciousness (quantum-dissipation, soliton-catalytic, and 'sensation from evolution of action') cannot address the explanatory gap, whereas the complementary proto-experience (PE)-SE framework addresses this gap and elucidates subjective experiences of space and time.

Abstract

Abstract The investigation of subjective experiences (SEs) of space and time is at the core of consciousness research. The term ‘space’ includes the subject and objects. The SE of subject, I-ness, is defined as ‘Self’. The SEs of objects, subject’s external body, and subject’s internal states such as feelings, thoughts, and so on can be investigated using the proto-experience (PE)-SE framework. The SE of time is defined as ‘phenomenal time’ (which includes past, present and future) and the SE of space as ‘phenomenal space’. The three non-experiential materialistic models are as follows: (I) The quantum-dissipation model [25] can connect the discrete neural signals to classical electromagnetic field to ‘quantum field theory and chaos theory’ for explaining memory. (II) The soliton-catalytic model [8] hypothesizes that all living processes including micro- and macro-processes can be explained by catalysis process. (III) The ‘sensation from evolution of action’ model [13] proposes that SEs are internalized during evolution. All these models can address to some extent the function of structures, such as perception. They cannot address explanatory gap. The complementary experiential PE-SE framework [37] addresses this psycho-physical gap and elucidates the SEs of space and time.

Citations in the library