Expectations change the signatures and timing of electrophysiological correlates of perceptual awareness.
Lucia Melloni, Caspar M Schwiedrzik, Notger G Müller, Eugenio Rodríguez, Wolf Singer
Journal of Neuroscience January 26, 2011 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4570-10.2011 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational study with parametric manipulation Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human subjects |
| Measures | event-related potentials |
| Key findings | Expectations lower the threshold of conscious perception and reduce the latency of neuronal signatures differentiating seen and unseen stimuli from ~300 ms to ~200 ms after stimulus. The P2 amplitude decreases as visibility increases, and at matched performance, seen and unseen responses differ regardless of physical stimulus properties. |
Abstract
Previous experience allows the brain to predict what comes next. How these expectations affect conscious experience is poorly understood. In particular, it is unknown whether and when expectations interact with sensory evidence in granting access to conscious perception, and how this is reflected electrophysiologically. Here, we parametrically manipulate sensory evidence and expectations while measuring event-related potentials in human subjects to assess the time course of evoked responses that correlate with subjective visibility, the properties of the stimuli, and/or perceptual expectations. We found that expectations lower the threshold of conscious perception and reduce the latency of neuronal signatures differentiating seen and unseen stimuli. Without expectations, this differentiation occurs ∼300 ms and with expectations ∼200 ms after stimulus in occipitoparietal sensors. The amplitude of this differentiating response component (P2) decreases as visibility increases, regardless of whether this increase is attributable to enhanced sensory evidence and/or the gradual buildup of perceptual expectations. Importantly, at matched performance levels, responses to seen and unseen stimuli differed regardless of the physical stimulus properties. These findings indicate that the latency of the neuronal correlates of access to consciousness depend on whether access is driven by stimulus saliency or by a combination of expectations and sensory evidence.
Citations in the library
Cited by 74
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- An Interoceptive Predictive Coding Model of Conscious Presence Frontiers in Psychology 2012
- Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience July 1, 2022
- Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews December 17, 2011
- Are the Neural Correlates of Consciousness in the Front or in the Back of the Cerebral Cortex? Clinical and Neuroimaging Evidence Journal of Neuroscience October 4, 2017
and 69 more in the library
Cites 4
- Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness PLoS Biology September 25, 2007
- Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task. Consciousness and Cognition December 2006
- Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology General December 2000
- Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences August 1, 1997