Challenging the medical materialists
BMJ August 10, 2011 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5017 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that evolutionary theory and neuroscience are inadequate for addressing inescapable human problems, proposing that William James's The Varieties of Religious Experience offers a better perspective. |
Abstract
The belief that the theory of evolution and the neurosciences have something important to tell us about the inescapable problems of human existence has once again become fashionable. In my view, this is false and facile; a reading of the first chapter of William James’s The Varieties of Religious Experience should explain why. James (1842–1910) was one of three distinguished siblings. His brother Henry was the famous novelist, whom some find long winded and over-refined. His sister Alice became famous posthumously for the diary that she kept during her various breakdowns and the lung cancer that eventually killed her. William was one of those many distinguished doctors who never actually practised, though after he qualified …