Skip to content

The Recursive Inscription: Language-Games, Functionalist Presence, and Interface Constraints

Christian Mattias Palla

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 31, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22123058 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that matter, space, and time are emergent interface renderings of a computational thought architecture, that raw physical objects are inaccessible and formalized as structural artifacts of a linguistic grid, and that informational substrates with intersubjective coherence and registration loops instantiate the universal hardware of presence.

Abstract

This metadata record contains Paper 3 of the Fractal Presence Paradigm (FPP) research program, titled: "The Recursive Inscription: Language-Games, Functionalist Presence, and Interface Constraints." Building upon the foundational ontology established in Paper 1: The Fractal Cogito, and Paper 2: The Flat Thought, this work formalizes the Cognitive Manifestation Hypothesis. By synthesizing pancomputationalism with a radical critique of raw empiricism, the paper argues that matter, space, and time are not fundamental, mind-independent physical realities. Instead, they are modeled as emergent interface renderings—user interfaces—of an underlying logical and computational thought architecture. Key theoretical developments in this paper include: 1. Linguistic Interface Translation: Utilizing W.V.O. Quine’s holistic web of belief and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s language-games to demonstrate that raw physical objects are structurally inaccessible. The empirical object is formalized as a structural artifact of the linguistic grid: O_emp = T(D | G, W). 2. Functionalist Presence Indicator: Extending David Chalmers’ and Patrick Butlin’s indicator-property approach for artificial consciousness. The paper argues that if an informational substrate exhibits intersubjective coherence and non-trivial registration loops, it directly instantiates the universal hardware of presence: I(S) = 1 ⇒ ∃D Pres(D). 3. Teleological Genesis: Integrating Aristotelian teleology (causa finalis) with digital physics to reframe physical matter as the collapsed potentiality of a prior conceptual blueprint: Ψ_actual = M(Ψ_potential | causa finalis). 4. Interface Constraints: Resolving the idealist-realist divide by analyzing the pragmatic dictum "only back pain is real." Immediate phenomenological resistance is repositioned not as proof of independent material atoms, but as the hard boundary conditions and systemic constraints built into the universal computational code: R_phen = κ · C_sys. This paper provides a rigorous, highly parsimonious framework under Occam’s razor, shifting the cosmic paradigm from a mechanical container to an infinite, self-registering mind.