Skip to content

A Detailed Comparative Assessment of Two Treatment Procedures (Standard Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Rapid-Acting Therapies/Specifically Ketamine) For Patients Suffering from Treatment-Resistant Depression Along with Evaluating the Effectiveness of These Approaches in Alleviating Symptoms and Improving Patient Outcomes: An Original Research Study

Dr. Dheerendra Kumar, Dr. Praveen Sachan, Dr. Piyush Verma

International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology April 30, 2026 DOI: 10.25258/ijddt.16.23s.115 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Comparative study (non-randomized, two-group comparison) Peer reviewed
Sample size 60
Population Patients aged 18 to 51 with treatment-resistant depression, diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder or bipolar disorder, who failed at least two antidepressant trials
Interventions SSRIs Ketamine
Measures Quality of Life metrics (specific instruments not named)
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine Serotonin
Key points Ketamine (including IV and intranasal esketamine) was more effective than SSRIs in rapidly relieving depressive symptoms, with better response rates, effectiveness, onset of action, efficacy, and maintenance of effect, but requires repeated dosing and may cause dissociation.

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare two treatment procedures (standard selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and rapid-acting therapies/specifically ketamine) for patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression along with evaluating the effectiveness of these approaches in alleviating symptoms and improving patient outcomes.

Materials and Methods: This study examined 80 patients suffering from severe sadness, hopelessness, and emotional numbness. Of these, 60 patients (ages 18 to 51) were diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression after failing to achieve satisfactory results with at least two antidepressant trials. Eligible participants had a documented diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder or bipolar disorder, demonstrating insufficient clinical progress despite adequate treatment for a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks. The final cohort of 60 patients was divided into two groups: Group 1 received standard treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while Group 2 explored rapidacting therapies, specifically ketamine. The intention was to compare the efficacy of these two approaches in improving depressive symptoms and overall patient outcomes, offering insights into potential treatment advantages for those with treatment-resistant depression. Statistical Analysis and Results The study focused on a diverse cohort of 60 patients aged 18 to 51, all diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression. Group 1 received selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while Group 2 was treated with innovative rapid-acting therapies, particularly ketamine. A comparative analysis assessed treatment efficacy using metrics related to Quality of Life, evaluated through the Pearson Chi-Square test. Group 1's findings (n=30) showed a total score of 19 across various factors, while Group 2 (also n=30) demonstrated higher scores in most areas. Specifically, Group 2 outperformed Group 1 in response rates, effectiveness, and onset of action, efficacy, and maintenance of effect. Lastly, authors also summarize the overall treatment effects analyzed with one-way ANOVA, highlighting the comparative effectiveness and safety of SSRIs versus ketamine in treating treatment-resistant depression.

Conclusion: This study concluded that Ketamine, including IV and intranasal esketamine, is more effective than SSRIs for quickly relieving symptoms. To sustain its benefits, it requires repeated doses, usually twice weekly for two weeks. It is primarily for patients who haven't responded to at least two previous antidepressant treatments and may cause dissociation.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on ketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Rapid Resolution of Suicidal Ideation After a Single Infusion of anN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonist in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder Subjects with DSM-IV-diagnosed treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2010 Open-label trial n = 33
Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults (≥ 18 years) with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term study n = 802
Intravenous arketamine for treatment-resistant depression: open-label pilot study Humans with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Open-label pilot trial n = 7
A Phase 2 Open Label Study of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SLS-002 (Intranasal Racemic Ketamine) in Adults with MDD at Imminent Risk of Suicide. Hospitalized patients with Major Depressive Disorder and acute suicidal ideation and... 2024 Open label study n = 17
Ketamine Safety and Tolerability in Clinical Trials for Treatment-Resistant Depression Participants with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant... 2014 Pooled analysis of three clinical trials n = 97

Explore topics

By condition and practice