Skip to content

A systematic review of cognitive-behavioral treatment for nightmares: toward a well-established treatment.

Jaap Lancee, Victor I. Spoormaker, Barry Krakow, Jan Van den Bout

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine October 1, 2008 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.27285 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Qualitative Case report Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Humans Imagination Dreams Desensitization, psychologic Relaxation therapy Cognitive behavioral therapy Practice, psychological
Key findings Nightmare-focused CBT approaches, particularly exposure and imagery rehearsal therapy, appear more effective than indirect CBT such as relaxation or recording, though all interventions and placebos produced significant pre-to-post improvement (d = 0.7-2.9). Only one randomized trial directly compared imagery rehearsal therapy with exposure, and the authors conclude that independent trials comparing these two techniques are needed.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on nightmare frequency and to determine which kind of CBT is the most effective treatment. A systematic literature search was carried out in PsychInfo and PubMed articles published on or before May 1, 2008. The inclusion criteria were: nightmare treatment study, use of nonpharmacological treatment, not a qualitative case study, randomized-controlled trial (RCT). After selection, 12 peer-reviewed studies about 9 RCTs remained (2 follow-up studies and one displaying preliminary results). Several interventions have been reviewed including, recording one's nightmares, relaxation, exposure, and techniques of cognitive restructuring. The 12 evaluated articles varied in quality, and none fulfilled CONSORT guidelines. All articles used nightmare frequency as the primary dependent variable, and all found significant in-group differences (pre vs. post) for intervention or placebo (range d = 0.7-2.9). Five studies were able to find a significant group effect for the intervention compared to a waiting list control group. Only one study found significant differences between 2 intervention groups. Nightmare-focused CBT (exposure and imagery rehearsal therapy [IRT]) revealed better treatment outcomes than indirect CBT (relaxation, recording). IRT and exposure showed no meaningful differences, but only one RCT directly compared both techniques. Three different research groups demonstrated the effects of exposure, but only one group showed the effect of IRT. Thus, RCTs that compare IRT with exposure by independent research groups are much needed.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. 2013 Systematic review with meta-analytic comparison
Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research 2016 Meta-analysis
The effectiveness of lucid dreaming therapy in patients with nightmares: A systematic review. Adults with chronic and recurring nightmares 2023 Systematic review
The relationships between insomnia, nightmares, and dreams: A systematic review Individuals without a concomitant psychopathology, including those with insomnia or... 2024 Systematic review
Psychosocial treatments for nightmares in adults and children: a systematic review 2023 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics