Skip to content

A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis.

Robert Simpson, Stephanie Posa, Laura Langer, Tania Bruno, Sharon Simpson, Maggie Lawrence, Jo Booth, Stewart W Mercer, Anthony Feinstein, Mark Bayley

Journal of Neurology November 9, 2022 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11451-x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Peer reviewed
Sample size 937
Population People with multiple sclerosis, mostly ambulatory, with cognitively impaired patients largely excluded
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Multiple sclerosis Comorbidity Quality of life Bias Meta-analysis Systematic review
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions improved overall quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis (standardized mean difference 0.40, 14 trials), with a similar effect on multiple-sclerosis-specific quality of life (0.39, 8 trials) and the largest benefit on mental health-related quality of life (0.70, 8 trials). The authors conclude these interventions are effective for quality of life, particularly mental health-related quality of life, but note more research is needed on optimal format, mechanisms, and effects in more diverse populations.

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is commonly impaired among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The aim of this study was to evaluate via meta-analysis the efficacy of Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for improving QoL in PwMS.

Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via searching six major electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, AMED, and PsycINFO) in April 2022. The primary outcome was QoL. Study quality was determined using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was undertaken. Effect sizes are reported as Standardized Mean Difference (SMD). Prospero ID: 139835.

Results: From a total of 1312 individual studies, 14 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, total participant n = 937. Most studies included PwMS who remained ambulatory. Cognitively impaired PwMS were largely excluded. Comorbidities were inconsistently reported. Most MBIs were delivered face-to face in group format, but five were online. Eight studies (n = 8) measured MS-specific QoL. In meta-analysis, overall effect size (SMD) for any QoL measure (n = 14) was 0.40 (0.18-0.61), p = 0.0003, I2 = 52%. SMD for MS-specific QoL measures (n = 8) was 0.39 (0.21-0.57), p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%. MBI effect was largest on subscale measures of mental QoL (n = 8), SMD 0.70 (0.33-1.06), p = 0.0002, I2 = 63%. Adverse events were infrequently reported.

Conclusions: MBIs effectively improve QoL in PwMS. The greatest benefits are on mental health-related QoL. However, more research is needed to characterize optimal formatting, mechanisms of action, and effects in PwMS with more diverse social, educational, and clinical backgrounds.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 22

and 17 more in the library

Explore topics