Drug checking services at music festivals and events in a Canadian setting.
Karen McCrae, Samuel Tobias, Kenneth W. Tupper, J. Arredondo, B. Henry, Silvina C. Mema, E. Wood, L. Ti
Drug and Alcohol Dependence December 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107589 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 336 |
| Population | Drug samples submitted by clients at music festivals and events in British Columbia |
| Duration | July to September 2018 |
| Key findings | A large proportion of substances contained unexpected adulterants, with 27 of 233 psychedelic samples and 24 of 66 stimulant samples containing additional contaminants. |
Abstract
Objectives: Drug checking is a harm reduction intervention that allows for identification of drug composition. The objective of the study was to assess drug market components and concordance between expected substance reported by clients and results from point-of-care drug checking at music festivals and events in British Columbia.
Methods: From July to September 2018, we provided drug checking services at four events using combination Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and fentanyl immunoassay strips. We measured concordance between expected substance as reported by clients to the results from the FTIR/fentanyl immunoassay strip and tracked unexpected adulterants.
Results: In total, 336 checks were completed. Most samples were expected by clients to be psychedelics (69.3%) or stimulants (19.6%). Of the 233 psychedelic samples, 169 (72.5%) contained the expected, unadulterated substance, and 27 (11.6%) contained additional contaminants. Of 66 stimulant samples, 41 (62.1%) contained expected substance, while 24 (36.4%) contained additional contaminants. Unexpected adulterants such as fentanyl, levamisole, and phenacetin were also found, in addition to several novel psychoactive substances.
Discussion: We found a large proportion of substances that contained unexpected adulterants. Our findings highlight the value of continued drug checking and will be helpful in designing future harm reduction interventions in similar contexts.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- First drug-checking study at an electronic festival and fentanyl detection in the central region of Mexico Harm Reduction Journal December 10, 2023
- Evaluation of an electrochemical sensor and comparison with spectroscopic approaches as used today in practice for harm reduction in a festival setting-A case study: Analysis of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine samples. Drug Testing and Analysis September 1, 2024
- The Relationship Between Naturalistic Psychedelic Use and Clinical Care in Canada Journal of Psychoactive Drugs July 29, 2023
Cites 2
- Who is ‘Molly’? MDMA adulterants by product name and the impact of harm-reduction services at raves Journal of Psychopharmacology July 10, 2017
- The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) in the Netherlands: implementation, results, and international comparison. Drug Testing and Analysis September 2011