Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Integration versus conflict between schools of dream theory and dreamwork: integrating the psychological core qualities of dreams with the contemporary knowledge of the dreaming brain.

Ole Vedfelt

Journal of Analytical Psychology February 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12574 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Dream research and psychotherapy have historically been fragmented, with schools like Freudian, Jungian, existential, and cognitive approaches in conflict and largely disconnected from neuropsychological findings. This paper proposes that complex cybernetic information network theory can provide a unifying framework for dream research and dreamwork. Within this framework, ten core qualities of dreams are delineated, supported by therapeutic knowledge and scientific research: dreams deal with important matters, symbolize, personify, serve as safe trial runs, connect to unconscious intelligence, perform pattern recognition, enable high-level communication, condense information, provide experiences of wholeness, and represent psychological energy landscapes. The author describes dreamwork sequences from their practice and offers practical recommendations, arguing that dreams are a significant psychological resource.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Psychology Medicine
Key finding Proposes that complex cybernetic information network theory can create an overriding framework for uncovering common traits across branches of dream research and dreamwork, delineating ten core qualities of dreams.

Abstract

The various ways schools of psychotherapy relate to dreams have been marked by isolationism and mutual conflict rather than self-examination and then integrating the discoveries and methods of other schools. Jung's method was in opposition to Freud's psychoanalysis. Existential psychology was dismissive of Freud's and Jung's discoveries, while cognitive dream interpretation and cognitive therapy sought other roads entirely. In addition, scientific and neuropsychological dream research has been only insignificantly tied to the psychotherapeutic dream theories. These conflicts and the lack of a comprehensive dream theory has made it convenient for the current rationalist collective consciousness and treatment systems to reject the often times challenging knowledge about ourselves that dreams can provide. This paper describes how contemporary theories of complex cybernetic information networks can create an overriding, constructive framework for uncovering common traits within the above-mentioned branches of dream research and dreamwork. Within this framework, ten core qualities are delineated, supported by both therapeutic knowledge as well as scientific research: 1) Dreams deal with matters important to us; 2) Dreams symbolize; 3) Dreams personify; 4) Dreams are trial runs in a safe place; 5) Dreams are online to unconscious intelligence; 6) Dreams are pattern recognition; 7) Dreams are high level communication; 8) Dreams are condensed information; 9) Dreams are experiences of wholeness; 10) Dreams are psychological energy landscapes. For each core quality I describe short dreamwork sequences from my own practice and a schematic image of how I perceive the overriding interaction between systems in the dreaming brain. For each core quality recommendations for practical dreamwork are provided. Finally, I draw attention to dreams as a huge psychological resource for humankind.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment