Skip to content

Contemplative praxis and the political economy of capitalism

Charles T. Lee

June 17, 2026 DOI: 10.4324/9781003543329-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Keywords Contemplation Politics Alienation Resistance ecology Praxis Temptation Ambivalence Environmental ethics Power physics Political economy Humanism Ideology Transcendence philosophy Late capitalism Aesthetics Narrative Consumerism Epistemology
Key points Proposes that contemplative resistance, grounded in nonduality and nonattachment, can empower practitioners to navigate capitalism by holding space for ambivalent political possibilities rather than adopting a binary oppositional stance.

Abstract

This chapter advances a distinct conception of contemplative resistance in relation to the political economy of capitalism, grounded in nonduality, nonattachment, and endogenous critique. This conception resists the temptation of absolute purity that positions contemplative practices as either for or against capitalism; instead, it situates them existentially within the capitalist political economy, understanding them as intertwining capitalist and noncapitalist elements, as well as instrumental and noninstrumental orientations. The chapter first critiques two routes of contemplative engagement in the transnational landscape of Buddhism: Humanistic Buddhism, which lacks a structural analysis of power inequity, and anti-capitalist Buddhism, which challenges capitalism but only through a binary-oppositional lens. Next, it proposes an endogenous and nondualistic understanding of contemplative resistance that empowers practitioners to “hold space” for ambivalent and paradoxical political possibilities. This approach enables practitioners to navigate life within capitalism, securing what they need for survival and well-being while negotiating, subverting, and redirecting two systemic effects of capitalism on minds and bodies: (1) alienation and “false consciousness” per Marx; and (2) docile bodies per Foucault. Drawing from the author&s;s academic experience, the chapter illustrates how this nonbinary and nonlinear form of contemplative resistance can be practiced within the intensely neoliberal environment of higher education.