Skip to content

The effects of mindfulness-based interventions on symptoms of depression, anxiety, and cancer-related fatigue in oncology patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ellentika Chayadi, N. Baes, L. Kiropoulos

PLoS One July 14, 2022 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269519 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,677
Population Oncology populations (people with cancer)
Interventions Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery
Duration At least three months post-intervention follow-up
Topics Anxiety Depression Meditation
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions produced moderate reductions in depression (Hedges' g = 0.43), anxiety (Hedges' g = 0.55), and cancer-related fatigue (Hedges' g = 0.43) in oncology populations, with effects maintained at least three months post-intervention.

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly being integrated into oncological treatment to mitigate psychological distress and promote emotional and physical well-being. This review aims to provide the most recent evaluation of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), and Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) treatments, in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety and CRF in oncology populations.

Methods: A search using the following search terms was conducted: (mindful* OR mindfulness* OR mindfulness-based* OR MBI* OR MBCT OR MBSR OR MBCR) AND (Oncol* OR cancer OR neoplasm OR lymphoma OR carcinoma OR sarcoma) to obtain relevant publications from five databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE by EC, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global from January 2000 to February 2022. 36 independent studies (n = 1677) were evaluated for their overall effect sizes (using random-effects models), subgroup analyses, and quality appraisals. Evaluations were performed separately for non-randomized (K = 20, n = 784) and randomized controlled trials (K = 16, n = 893).

Results: The results showed that MBIs have significant medium effects in reducing symptoms of depression (Hedges’ g = 0.43), anxiety (Hedges’ g = 0.55) and CRF (Hedges’ g = 0.43), which were maintained at least three months post-intervention. MBIs were also superior in reducing symptoms of anxiety (Hedges’ g = 0.56), depression (Hedges’ g = 0.43), and CRF (Hedges’ g = 0.42) in oncology samples relative to control groups. The superiority of MBIs to control groups was also maintained at least three months post-intervention for anxiety and CRF symptoms, but not for depressive symptoms. The risk of bias of the included studies were low to moderate.

Conclusions: This review found that MBIs reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety and CRF in oncology populations. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42020143286.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on anxiety, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Research Review: The effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents – a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Children and adolescents 2018 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 3,666
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Does Mindfulness Meditation Improve Anxiety and Mood Symptoms? A Review of the Controlled Research Clinical populations with medical and emotional disorders 2007 Systematic review n = 15
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 47

and 42 more in the library

Cites 25

and 20 more in the library

Explore topics