Skip to content

Online and traditional mindfulness-based interventions for stress in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis versus control conditions.

Frontiers in Psychology March 27, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1755245 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Population University students
Interventions Online mindfulness traditional mindfulness
Topics Meditation
Key findings Both online and traditional mindfulness interventions reduced stress and improved mindfulness among university students, with comparable effect sizes: stress SMD = -0.56 for online and -0.64 for traditional; mindfulness SMD = 0.52 for online and 0.42 for traditional. The authors conclude online mindfulness may be a viable alternative to traditional mindfulness for student stress reduction.

Abstract

Objective: Empirical evidence verifies the efficacy of mindfulness interventions in addressing heterogeneous stress forms across clinical and non-clinical populations. However, online mindfulness is increasingly emerging in diverse modalities across online platforms, propelled by ongoing technological advancements. This study aims to conduct a systematic analysis of the intervention effects of online versus traditional mindfulness in alleviating stress among university students. It is important to note that this review compares online and traditional formats indirectly, by synthesizing trials that separately compare each format against a control condition, as head-to-head RCTs directly comparing both formats were not eligible for inclusion.

Methods: Four databases were selected as data sources: Web of Science, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO. A total of 4,387 articles were included based on the PICOS framework established a priori , and 16 articles were ultimately incorporated into the meta-analysis. During data analysis, article quality was appraised utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, with data extraction performed in Microsoft Excel and statistical analyses conducted in Stata.

Results: Analysis of the included studies indicated that online mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.56; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.36) effectively reduced stress in university students, with traditional mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.46) demonstrating comparable results. For improving mindfulness among university students, both online mindfulness (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.76) and traditional mindfulness (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.59) yield positive outcomes.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that both online and traditional mindfulness effectively reduce university students’ stress and enhance their mindfulness levels. And the effects of these two intervention methods are comparable. Therefore, online mindfulness may serve as a viable and similarly effective alternative to traditional mindfulness for stress reduction among college students. Systematic review

Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251025123 , CRD420251025123.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics